<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Find the Winners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2010/02/02/how-to-find-the-winners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2010/02/02/how-to-find-the-winners/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Dorsey Wright Money Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Return of Active Share &#171; Systematic Relative Strength</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2010/02/02/how-to-find-the-winners/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>The Return of Active Share &#171; Systematic Relative Strength</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=1669#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve written about active share before, and this new Wall Street Journal article is a welcome addition to the discussion.  One of the interesting things to me is why there has been such a rise in closet indexing.  I have a couple of hypotheses, but since there is no way to confirm or disconfirm them directly, you&#8217;ll just have to determine for yourself if they make sense. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve written about active share before, and this new Wall Street Journal article is a welcome addition to the discussion.  One of the interesting things to me is why there has been such a rise in closet indexing.  I have a couple of hypotheses, but since there is no way to confirm or disconfirm them directly, you&#8217;ll just have to determine for yourself if they make sense. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Those Who Can&#8217;t Do, Invest Passively &#171; Systematic Relative Strength</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2010/02/02/how-to-find-the-winners/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Those Who Can&#8217;t Do, Invest Passively &#171; Systematic Relative Strength</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=1669#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ve discussed before, high active share and high tracking error is associated with superior performance.  If you want big numbers, you have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve discussed before, high active share and high tracking error is associated with superior performance.  If you want big numbers, you have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

