By now, it’s pretty apparent that the Euro is eventually going to be toast, just like the ERM imploded before it. (Perhaps it was never logical to assume that one currency and one central bank would be able to satisfy many different cultures and political regimes?) Of course there is a lot of hand-wringing going on about all of the bad things that will happen, but no one is talking about the offsetting good things that will happen.
We’ve written before about beanbag economics, the essence of which is that when you smush in one part of a beanbag, it just poofs out somewhere else. Relative strength is a simple and effective way to see where trends are underway.
Consider a typical bad news lead in this Reuters article:
Worries about a run on Greek banks has rattled Athens this week, after savers withdrew at least 700 million euros on Monday alone…
That sounds quite scary. However, buried deep in the article, at the very end, is the beanbag economics section:
Deposits shifted around Europe dramatically last year, analysis of data from more than 120 listed European banks show.
More than 120 billion euros was taken from two banks in Belgium alone, including an exodus of customer deposits from Dexia (DEXI.BR) which had to be bailed out and restructured. KBC (KBC.BR) also saw a big outflow.
Some 90 billion euros was taken from France’s banks, including around 30 billion each from Credit Agricole (CAGR.PA) and BNP Paribas (BNPP.PA). French banks were hit last year by their heavy exposure to Greece and concerns about their liquidity that forced them to accelerate plans to shrink.
Worries the euro zone crisis would spread also saw about 30 billion euros in deposits leave Italian banks, although inflows to BBVA (BBVA.MC) helped limit the net outflow from Spain.
Cash flooded into Britain; more than 140 billion euros was deposited in four big banks alone. The UK benefits from its position outside the euro zone and its Asia-focused banks HSBC (HSBA.L) and Standard Chartered (STAN.L) are seen as particular safe-havens.
Other banks to see big inflows included Barclays (BARC.L), Germany’s Deutsche Bank (DBKGn.DE), Switzerland’s Credit Suisse (CSGN.VX) and UBS (UBSN.VX) and Russia’s Sberbank (SBER.MM) and VTB (VTBR.MM).
Banks that were in trouble had deposits leave, but they didn’t vanish into thin air. Other banks saw massive inflows at their expense. And—think about it—the Greek and French banks had the money in the first place because depositors saw them as relatively more attractive than European stocks or their mattresses, or whatever, at the time. Times have now changed and the flow of money is being directed somewhere else. It’s not the end of the world when some asset class implodes, unless, of course, you have 100% of your assets in it. That implosion works to the benefit of another asset class somewhere else.
There are always relative winners and losers; things are rarely completely one-sided. This is the primary attraction of using relative strength for tactical asset allocation. It is able to identify shifts in supply and demand by measuring what assets are strong and what assets are weak. Markets all over the world operate and interact in this same way.