<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Systematic Relative Strength</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systematicrelativestrength.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Dorsey Wright Money Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results &#8211; 4/27/12 by - Systematic Relative Strength</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/dorsey-wright-client-sentiment-survey-results-42712/#comment-12308</link>
		<dc:creator>- Systematic Relative Strength</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13065#comment-12308</guid>
		<description>[...] same thing will happen this time, but it fits in with the generally negative sentiment we see in our client behavior survey as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same thing will happen this time, but it fits in with the generally negative sentiment we see in our client behavior survey as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two Rides the Public Missed&#8230; by Stuff I&#8217;m reading: Two Rides the Public Missed… &#187; st0ckthief</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/07/two-rides-the-public-missed/#comment-12307</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff I&#8217;m reading: Two Rides the Public Missed… &#187; st0ckthief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13030#comment-12307</guid>
		<description>[...] Two Rides the Public Missed… « Systematic Relative Strength. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two Rides the Public Missed… « Systematic Relative Strength. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Beanbag Economics by Beanbag Economics and Relative Strength &#124; &#124; Retirement Investments -- MyPlanIQRetirement Investments &#8212; MyPlanIQ</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/03/02/more-beanbag-economics/#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Beanbag Economics and Relative Strength &#124; &#124; Retirement Investments -- MyPlanIQRetirement Investments &#8212; MyPlanIQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=12033#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about beanbag economics, the essence of which is that when you smush in one part of a beanbag, it just poofs out somewhere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about beanbag economics, the essence of which is that when you smush in one part of a beanbag, it just poofs out somewhere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Beanbag Economics by - Systematic Relative Strength</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/03/02/more-beanbag-economics/#comment-12286</link>
		<dc:creator>- Systematic Relative Strength</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=12033#comment-12286</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about beanbag economics, the essence of which is that when you smush in one part of a beanbag, it just poofs out somewhere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about beanbag economics, the essence of which is that when you smush in one part of a beanbag, it just poofs out somewhere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Volatility by Mike Moody</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/04/managing-volatility/#comment-12262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=12972#comment-12262</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I believe anything can be forecast!  I don&#039;t have much faith in forecasting generally.  I certainly don&#039;t think returns can be forecast.  Relative strength is a return factor, like value, and by exposing a portfolio to it, you can reap whatever is available.  I just don&#039;t think anyone can say with any certainty what that return is likely to be any given year.

Regarding volatility forecasting specifically, I would note that VAR is based on a volatility forecast.  If it were really that simple to do, Long Term Capital Management probably wouldn&#039;t have hit the ground at terminal velocity, nor would JP Morgan have blown away a few billion dollars.  

Traditional asset allocation requires returns, standard deviations, and correlations.  All of these change over time, but returns change the most--and mean variance optimization is most sensitive to returns.

I&#039;m looking forward with optimism to your forthcoming paper researching the relative forecastability of those factors.  It could be a big contribution to the literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I believe anything can be forecast!  I don&#8217;t have much faith in forecasting generally.  I certainly don&#8217;t think returns can be forecast.  Relative strength is a return factor, like value, and by exposing a portfolio to it, you can reap whatever is available.  I just don&#8217;t think anyone can say with any certainty what that return is likely to be any given year.</p>
<p>Regarding volatility forecasting specifically, I would note that VAR is based on a volatility forecast.  If it were really that simple to do, Long Term Capital Management probably wouldn&#8217;t have hit the ground at terminal velocity, nor would JP Morgan have blown away a few billion dollars.  </p>
<p>Traditional asset allocation requires returns, standard deviations, and correlations.  All of these change over time, but returns change the most&#8211;and mean variance optimization is most sensitive to returns.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward with optimism to your forthcoming paper researching the relative forecastability of those factors.  It could be a big contribution to the literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Navigating the ETF Galaxy by Tuesday links: cobbled together strategies &#124; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/15/navigating-the-etf-galaxy/#comment-12227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday links: cobbled together strategies &#124; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13111#comment-12227</guid>
		<description>[...] A hitchhiker&#8217;s guide to the ETF galaxy.  (ETFdb also Systematic Relative Strength) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A hitchhiker&#8217;s guide to the ETF galaxy.  (ETFdb also Systematic Relative Strength) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Volatility by Adam Butler</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/04/managing-volatility/#comment-12197</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=12972#comment-12197</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

Thanks for your thoughtful reply.

At root, I guess I&#039;m surprised by your belief that returns can be forecast (via momentum), but volatility and correlation forecasts are elusive.

We just published an &lt;a href=&quot;http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/BP-120514-Adaptive-Asset-Allocation.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; on Adaptive Asset Allocation which demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating return (momentum), volatility and correlation forecasts across 10 major global asset classes into an integrated portfolio management framework. By the way, we used very standard parameters for the article - there are _much_ better ways to estimate volatility and correlation than 60 or 120 day rolling averages, and which don&#039;t use complex algos like GARCH.

We are currently working on a piece that researches the relative &#039;forecastability&#039; of each of the parameters - I will send it along to you. However, Eric Falkenstein did some interesting preliminary analysis at his site a while back on volatility forecasting:

http://falkenblog.blogspot.ca/2012/02/market-timing-rule-that-works.html

This and other research I&#039;ve seen suggests that volatility may be more easily forecast than returns (though momentum based return forecasts are not dealt with in Falkenstein&#039;s short article). 

Lots to think about, and thanks again for all your excellent work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughtful reply.</p>
<p>At root, I guess I&#8217;m surprised by your belief that returns can be forecast (via momentum), but volatility and correlation forecasts are elusive.</p>
<p>We just published an <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/BP-120514-Adaptive-Asset-Allocation.php" rel="nofollow">article</a> on Adaptive Asset Allocation which demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating return (momentum), volatility and correlation forecasts across 10 major global asset classes into an integrated portfolio management framework. By the way, we used very standard parameters for the article &#8211; there are _much_ better ways to estimate volatility and correlation than 60 or 120 day rolling averages, and which don&#8217;t use complex algos like GARCH.</p>
<p>We are currently working on a piece that researches the relative &#8216;forecastability&#8217; of each of the parameters &#8211; I will send it along to you. However, Eric Falkenstein did some interesting preliminary analysis at his site a while back on volatility forecasting:</p>
<p><a href="http://falkenblog.blogspot.ca/2012/02/market-timing-rule-that-works.html" rel="nofollow">http://falkenblog.blogspot.ca/2012/02/market-timing-rule-that-works.html</a></p>
<p>This and other research I&#8217;ve seen suggests that volatility may be more easily forecast than returns (though momentum based return forecasts are not dealt with in Falkenstein&#8217;s short article). </p>
<p>Lots to think about, and thanks again for all your excellent work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factor Investing by Mike Moody</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/factor-investing/#comment-12196</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13042#comment-12196</guid>
		<description>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/relative-strength-spread-57/

This is another way to assess how RS is doing versus the market.  We post this on a regular basis.  The long-term trend is steadily up, but there are periods where the spread moves down or is choppy.  We&#039;ve had a lot more of that lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/relative-strength-spread-57/" rel="nofollow">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/relative-strength-spread-57/</a></p>
<p>This is another way to assess how RS is doing versus the market.  We post this on a regular basis.  The long-term trend is steadily up, but there are periods where the spread moves down or is choppy.  We&#8217;ve had a lot more of that lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factor Investing by Mike Moody</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/08/factor-investing/#comment-12171</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 21:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13042#comment-12171</guid>
		<description>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/01/12/its-not-you-its-me/

Joe,
I&#039;ve included a link to an earlier post that describes one of the ways to assess how the market and the strategy are interacting.  We usually update our data annually.  The current paper can be found at www.dorseywrightmm.com on the resources tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/01/12/its-not-you-its-me/" rel="nofollow">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/01/12/its-not-you-its-me/</a></p>
<p>Joe,<br />
I&#8217;ve included a link to an earlier post that describes one of the ways to assess how the market and the strategy are interacting.  We usually update our data annually.  The current paper can be found at <a href="http://www.dorseywrightmm.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dorseywrightmm.com</a> on the resources tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dimon: &#8220;We Have The Royal Straight Flush&#8221; by Nick Sadowsky</title>
		<link>http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2012/05/10/dimon-we-have-the-royal-straight-flush/#comment-12157</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Sadowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systematicrelativestrength.com/?p=13091#comment-12157</guid>
		<description>Well said. Thanks for posting Andy. NS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Thanks for posting Andy. NS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

