An Inconvenient Truth: the Onion

May 5, 2011

Politicians and markets don’t always get along. When market prices behave in a way that is politically inconvenient, politicians tend to step in—usually with little understanding of the consequences. (Note: it doesn’t matter whether prices are plummeting or rocketing, it’s the politics that count.) When housing prices were rising, everyone was happy. When housing prices fell, politicians of all stripes felt a need to blame someone for the price collapse and to prop up the market. When gasoline prices are rising, politicians often feel the need to demonize someone.

One day soon, evil speculators will be blamed for some price misbehavior that is politically inconvenient. Don’t believe it. In fact, as Jonathan Hoenig points out in a Smart Money article:

…the fact is that speculative futures markets don’t create volatility, they reduce it.

For proof, let’s go back to the 1950s when farmers began to complain about the price of onions, which were falling. They appealed to their elected representatives to do something about the evil speculators who were obviously impacting their livelihoods. The biggest onion producing state at the time was Michigan, so Michigan congressman Gerald Ford pushed through the Onion Futures Act, which banned trading in onion futures. No more evil speculators. (According to the Smart Money article, it is still the only commodity-specific futures ban.)

I realize this must sound comical, but yes, Congress actually prevented speculation in onions!

Professor Mark Perry (of the University of Michigan!) recently posted a chart of onion price volatility, showing it in comparison to oil which still has a futures market despite recent calls to exorcise the evil energy speculators. Oil is much less volatile than the onion market:


Source: www.mjperry.blogspot.com

Lest you think that energy prices are just inherently less volatile than onions, even CFTC commissioner Joseph Dial in a 1997 speech pointed out:

…economists “found more cash market volatility in onion prices before and after the period of futures trading than there was while the onion futures market was operating. In other words, futures markets don’t cause volatility — they respond to and decrease volatility.”

Politicians can pass laws to hinder markets from operating efficiently, but they cannot repeal the law of supply and demand. That’s why price is all-powerful in the end. Auction markets are critical in determining the proper clearing price so that producers and consumers can make intelligent decisions in the future. Trying to curb “speculation” just causes poor capital allocation for society.

Postscript: for a complete academic treatment on futures markets and volatility reduction, this paper by David Jacks of Simon Fraser University is fantastic.


Relative Strength in Forex

May 5, 2011

Relative strength (“momentum” in academia) has been documented in stocks around the world, as well as in all sorts of assets classes. Now there is an academic paper out (Currency Momentum Strategies by Lukas Menkhoff, Lucio Sarno, Maik Schmeling, and Andreas Schrimpf) out that extends the outperformance of relative strength to currencies. From the abstract:

We find a large and significant cross-sectional spread in excess returns of up to 10% p.a. between past winner and past loser currencies, i.e. currencies with high recent returns continue to outperform currencies with low recent returns by a significant margin. Similar to momentum in equity markets, this spread in excess returns is not explained by traditional risk factors and shows behavior consistent with investor over- and under-reaction. Moreover, currency momentum is mostly driven by return continuation in spot rates (and not interest rate differentials) and has very different properties from the widely studied carry trade.

Very interesting stuff. It seems that momentum is part of the DNA of financial markets. Currencies, by the way, are included in the investment universe for our Global Macro strategy.

To obtain a fact sheet and prospectus for the Arrow DWA Tactical Fund (DWTFX), click here.

Click here for disclosures. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.


Fund Flows

May 5, 2011

The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Members of ICI manage total assets of $11.82 trillion and serve nearly 90 million shareholders. Flow estimates are derived from data collected covering more than 95 percent of industry assets and are adjusted to represent industry totals.

Taxable bond funds continued to attract the most new money last week, adding another $3.6 billion. There were modest inflows or modest outflows in the other fund categories for the week.