Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results - 12/2/11

December 12, 2011

Our latest sentiment survey was open from 12/2/11 to 12/9/11. The Dorsey, Wright Polo Shirt Raffle continues to drive advisor participation, and we greatly appreciate your support! This round, we had 47 advisors participate in the survey (holiday week = light traffic). If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least two other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. From survey to survey, the S&P rose around +2.4%. The overall fear number fell from 93% to 91%, off their recent highs. On the flip side, the opportunity group rose from 7% to 9%. Client sentiment seems like it will remain stuck in the mud for the remainder of the year.

Chart 2. Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. The spread fell this round, from 87% to 83%.

Question 2. Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. Overall risk numbers snapped back this round, from 2.08 to 2.40. We saw a much sharper move in this indicator to add risk, compared with the overall fear numbers.

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. Over 90% of all respondents were either 3 or below. We are seeing very low appetite for risk across the board.

Chart 5: Risk Appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. This chart plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. This bar chart sorts out as we expect, with the fear group looking for low risk and the opportunity group looking for more risk. Keep in mind that with the light holiday response, there were only 4 total respondents in the upturn category (again).

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group. Both groups’ risk appetite rose this round by a significant margin. The upturn group, in particular, hit all-time highs, but keep in mind there were only 4 respondents in that group.

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a spread chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread jumped to all-time highs this round, due to the upturn’s group move higher.

This survey, we saw a respectable market rally over two weeks, and most of our indicators responded as they should have. The greatest fear number dipped by a small margin, while the overall risk appetite numbers jumped by a large margin. We have had anemic response rates during the holiday, which is to be expected. Hopefully things will pick up when the new year arrives.

No one can predict the future, as we all know, so instead of prognosticating, we will sit back and enjoy the ride. A rigorously tested, systematic investment process provides a great deal of comfort for clients during these types of fearful, highly uncertain market environments. Until next time, good trading and thank you for participating.


Consumer Sentiment Faceoff

December 12, 2011

It’s important to read statistics carefully. Perhaps that’s obvious, but one always has to guard against intellectual laziness. It’s especially important to parse what is said and what is left unsaid.

My example today is a recent article at CXO Advisory that discusses the investment use of consumer confidence. Although I occasionally disagree with their conclusions, I think their work is generally excellent. In this case they ran some analyses looking for linkage between consumer confidence readings and subsequent market performance and came to the following conclusion:

In summary, evidence from simple tests offers little support for a belief that the behavior of the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index usefully predicts stock market returns at horizons of one to six months.

Contrast that with our own finding, looking at the entire history of the same consumer sentiment index, in an earlier article on Systematic Relative Strength:

When consumer sentiment was low–in the bottom three deciles–subsequent five-year returns in the S&P 500 were over 12% per year, significantly higher than the 9.3% average over the entire sample period. When consumers felt absolutely fantastic about things and sentiment was in the top decile, subsequent five-year returns were actually negative!

Both articles had convincing graphics to demonstrate their conclusions, so what gives? Is consumer sentiment useful or not?

I’m betting that both articles are correct. The difference is probably entirely in the timeframe. CXO found that consumer sentiment was not useful over a 1-6 month horizon, while we found it was a good predictor of outsized returns over a 5-year horizon. The evidence suggests that consumer confidence changes slowly, quite possibly in response to the business cycle—and the business cycle is often a 3-5 year affair.

Skimming either article and concluding “oh, consumer sentiment is a good (lousy) indicator” is not the right approach. There are always nuances—make sure you pay attention to all of the qualifications.


Weekly RS Recap

December 12, 2011

The table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap U.S. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return. Those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength. Relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong.

Last week’s performance (12/5/11 – 12/9/11) is as follows:

Although the stocks with the very best relative strength didn’t have a great week compared to the universe, those stocks in the third quartile (above average relative strength) actually did quite well.