Dr. Doom Stumbles

August 28, 2009

Prophecy: two bull’s eyes out of a possible million.
—Mark Twain

It seems there is always an active market for doomsayers, but apparently Nouriel Roubini’s recent forecasts haven’t worked out so well. I’m sure ours wouldn’t be any better, but that’s why we are trend followers.

Posted by:


Thank Goodness We Have Learned Our Lesson!

August 28, 2009

There’s almost no printable comment you can make about this story on Bloomberg.

Posted by:


Deflation Bites

August 28, 2009

A very interesting article by Randall Forsyth in Barron’s discusses the problem conservative investors are having right now. Economists are worried about inflation down the road if the government chooses to monetize its debt. But the current problem for investors is deflation.

Deflation has driven interest rates on cash to near zero. Interest income is $50 billion lower than a year ago. The recession has caused corporations—many of them financials—to cut dividends as well. I was surprised to learn that overall dividend income is down 25% from a year ago. And it is projected to get worse.

This can’t have a positive effect on consumer spending. And when consumer incomes drop, tax revenues also drop, which puts more pressure on the national deficit.

Investors are also in a bind. The best yields are available, as always, on the riskiest paper. Most of the time, if CDs and Treasurys have reasonable yields, the “widows and orphans” investors ignore high-yield debt. But under the current circumstances, I suppose there is a risk of investors stretching out their risk parameters to reach for yield. Given that bond mutual fund sales have recently been running at five times the level of stock fund sales, I’ve got to wonder whether all of that cash is ending up in an appropriate place on the risk spectrum.

Posted by:


Balance of Economic Power Shifts

August 28, 2009

Economists have assumed for some time that Asian economies would eventually be larger than the U.S. economy, mainly because the population is already large and some of the economies are relatively undeveloped with lots of room for upside growth. None of them expected it to happen this soon. One economist in this article in the International Herald Tribune thinks that the current recession was the turning point. Asia’s resurgence is still dependent on U.S. and European consumer spending, but economic development there has been extraordinary.

Economic realities will eventually translate into investment realities, so it is imperative that your investment policy be able to address changes as they occur.

Posted by:


The Growth Illusion

August 28, 2009

The faster the economy of a country grows, the better it is for that country’s stock market, right? Uh, not exactly. Click here to read the Economist’s summary of the work done by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton at the London Business School back in 2005. Over the 17 countries they studied, going back to 1900, there was actually a negative correlation between investment returns and growth in GDP per capita.

Emerging markets are doing great right now and that trend may persist for years. However, it would be incomplete to conclude that they are doing so solely because of growth in GDP. Supply and demand determine all prices. Prices trend. Investors who follow those trends in a systematic way can generate superior investment results over time. It is not necessary to get more complicated than that.

Posted by:


Gopher Mounds

August 28, 2009

Technicians have known it forever. Most investors have learned it the hard way. The “Level Playing Field” is full of gopher mounds. There is always someone who has an advantage in the market. It might be that they have more knowledge of an industry or a particular company. It might be that they are more disciplined. Or, as this article and video point out, it might be that they are large clients of a large firm. As Mr. Blodget points out, the playing field will never be level.

Neither the market nor life is fair. Once you accept that, you can focus on finding tools to overcome that problem. Technicians use price as a tool because it reflects the constant battle between supply and demand, regardless of whether it is a result of “huddles” or published material. We have chosen to use relative price (strength) because we have found it to be the best way for us to eavesdrop on the other teams’ huddles.

Posted by: