Tom Dorsey: ‘ETF Alchemy’ Is The Future

May 18, 2013

Where is the ETF industry headed?  Tom Dorsey answers in this Q&A with IndexUniverse.

IU.com:In the first four months of 2013, asset gathering for U.S. ETFs was in the neighborhood of $64 billion, and on pace to beat 2012’s record of $188 billion. Are you surprised? Is the sky the limit? How far is this ETF juggernaut going to go?

Dorsey: Well, I don’t think the sky is going to be the limit. I don’t know that there are any more ETFs that anyone can bring out that will be the new fandango. The key word here is a phrase I coined: “ETF alchemy.”

IU.com:ETF alchemy?

Dorsey: Think about this for a second: If I take H2 and I add O, what do I get?

IU.com:Water.

Dorsey: Yes, water. Each one of those two elements is separate. But when I combine the two, I come up with a substance—water—that you can’t live without. Each one separately is not as good as the two combined. And the concept here is, What’s out there in terms of ETFs I can combine together to make a better product?

Take for instance the Standard & Poor’s Low Volatility Index—and if you add that to PDP, which is our Technical Leaders Index, and combine the two, it’s like taking two glasses of water and pouring them into one bigger glass of water, 50-50. I end up with a better product than either one of them separately.

You’ll find this as we go along: the ability to combine different ETFs to create a better unit where the whole is better than the sum of its parts.

A little later in the interview, Tom Dorsey speaks to just how important the ETF has been to the industry:

IU.com:So that’s really the first ETF.

Dorsey: Yes, and I can’t tell you how many seminars I have taught to professionals on ETFs and the eyes that widen and the lives that change once they understand it and understand how to use it; it tells me we’re on the right path and this is the exact right product.

Like I’ve said to you before, it’s probably the most important product ever created in my 39 years in this business. And I believe back then when I talked to you that we’re in the first foot of a 26-mile marathon.

Dorsey Wright is the index provider for PDP.  For more information, please see www.powershares.com.

Posted by:


Momentum: “A Powerful Way To Enhance Returns”

April 10, 2013

Morningstar does a pretty deep dive into momentum in their article Does Momentum Investing Work?  I highly recommend reading the whole article as it covers some excellent long-term studies of momentum.  It also has a nice profile of our PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETF (PDP).

While practitioners have been exploiting this relationship for decades, the idea has gained broad acceptance in the academic community only within the past 20 years. Momentum runs counter to the predictions of the efficient market hypothesis, but the evidence is too overwhelming to ignore.

Included in their article was the following study of momentum on U.S. and global stocks:

The tables below illustrate the momentum effect among large-cap U.S. and global stocks. Each column represents a fifth of the total number of stocks in the sample, which are ranked by their momentum. While there is not a linear relationship between the momentum quintiles, stocks with the highest momentum consistently outperform those in the lowest momentum quintile. Small-cap stocks tend to exhibit a stronger momentum effect. However, they can be more expensive to trade.

french Momentum: A Powerful Way To Enhance Returns

I also enjoyed this part about how the persistence of excess returns from momentum strategies continues to baffle people:

This evidence creates a puzzle. If the market were efficient, a simple trading rule should not produce superior returns. Arbitrage is a powerful force that should eliminate any excess profits, and yet, momentum has persisted 20 years after it was first widely published. Perhaps more troubling to disciples of Ben Graham and Warren Buffett, momentum appears to be at odds with decades of research, which suggest that stocks trading at low valuations tend to outperform.

The article also makes a strong case for why momentum makes a better companion for value than does growth:

In their paper, “Value and Momentum Everywhere,” Asness, Moskowitz, and Pedersen found that momentum worked well when value didn’t, and vice versa. Because they are two sides of the same coin, each with excess returns, combining value and momentum in a portfolio can offer powerful diversification benefits.

It’s not necessary, or advisable, to abandon value investing to benefit from momentum. Instead, momentum may be a good substitute for investors’ growth allocations. Momentum offers higher expected returns than growth and tends to be less correlated with value. The chart below compares the performance of a portfolio consisting equal weights in the Russell 1000 Value and Growth indexes, with a portfolio that replaces the growth allocation with the AQR Momentum Index. The two portfolios have similar volatility, but the value and momentum portfolio offers slightly better absolute and risk-adjusted returns.

momentum value Momentum: A Powerful Way To Enhance Returns

Finally, I agree with Morningstar’s assessment of why the excess returns from momentum are likely to persist:

While a diversified and systematic momentum strategy can offer a powerful way to enhance returns, selecting a few stocks on the 52-week high list is a very bad idea. It is difficult to anticipate when a run will end and there may be no greater fool to bail you out. Although momentum is a short-term phenomenon, it is best suited for long-term investors. It won’t always work, but there’s a good chance that a disciplined momentum strategy will continue to outperform over the long term. After all, investor behavior won’t change overnight.

HT: Abnormal Returns

Posted by:


Smart Beta Gains Momentum

April 8, 2013

Reuters reports that the $35 trillion global pension fund industry continues its move into “Smart Beta” ETFs:

Frustrated by little or no extra gains from costly active investing, many are now looking at more passive, cheaper and simpler strategies.

Often called “Smart Beta”, one approach aims to follow certain benchmark indices passively but allow investors to tilt weightings themselves based on their preferences such as volatility or momentum, allowing them outperform the main index.

Smart beta is half way between active and passive investing. For example, an investor can take the S&P 500 index <.SPX> but overweight stocks with lower volatility to create a new smart index. Investing in this has potential to outperform the original benchmark index and is cheaper than paying an active manager to trade S&P stocks.

Our own PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETF (PDP), was among the first relative strength (momentum) ETFs available—began trading on March 1, 2007.  Three additional Technical Leaders ETFs have since been made available (PIE, PIZ, and DWAS) and combined they now have over $1.5 billion in assets under management and licensing.

Whether it is large pension funds or individual investors, the appeal of Smart Beta is on the rise.

See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


Looking Beyond the BRICS

March 27, 2013

Seeking Alpha weighs in on the merits of the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders ETF (PIE):

Most emerging market stock ETFs are heavy on the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China). The problem? If you are hanging with the largest emerging economies in 2013, you’ve been losing money. Note: Think Vanguard Emerging Markets (VWO).

In contrast, PIE uses relative strength when conducting its quarterly rebalancing. With Thailand, Indonesia, and Mexico having had the best momentum in the most recent quarter, the continuation of that momentum has led to phenomenal gains in Q1 2013. Despite a tendency by some commentators to overplay the fundamental valuation card, individual investors should not underestimate the impact that technical analysis is having on successful portfolios.

pie2 Looking Beyond the BRICS

Source: Yahoo! Finance

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.  See www.powershares.com for more information.  A list of all holdings for the trailing 12 months is available upon request.

Posted by:


More Big Emerging Markets Funds Close to New Investors

March 13, 2013

According to InvestmentNews there could be a lot of people looking for new ways to get exposure to emerging markets in the near future as three of the five largest actively managed emerging-markets funds have either closed to new investors or announced they will soon do so:

The $33 billion Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund (ODMAX), the largest actively managed emerging-markets fund, announced last week it will close to new investors in April. Spokeswoman Kaitlyn Downing said the closing will help position the fund for continued long-term growth.

It joins the $10 billion Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund (GEGAX) and the $8.3 billion Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HEMZX), the fourth and fifth largest such funds, in closing to new investors this year.

The $16 billion Lazard Emerging Markets Fund (LZEMX), the third largest actively managed emerging markets fund closed to new investors in 2010.

It might make sense for investors to consider using the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders ETF (PIE) as an alternative.  From a performance perspective, it stacks up nicely against the funds listed in the article.

pie More Big Emerging Markets Funds Close to New Investors

(Click to enlarge)

PIE is the second best performer since March 9, 2009 and is by far the best performer YTD.

Allocations to emerging markets are only expected to expand in the coming years:

The infatuation with the emerging markets, and their fast-growing economies, isn’t expected to slow down anytime soon. A majority of advisers — 51.4% — plan to increase their clients’ allocation to emerging-markets equity this year, according to the InvestmentNews 2013 Investment Outlook survey, in which 592 financial advisers participated.

Please see www.powershares.com for more information about PIE.  Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


PDP Gathers Steam

January 17, 2013

Paul Britt of IndexUniverse, after noting the strong inflows of the PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETF (PDP), had the following to say about its appeal:

In the end, PDP’s performance over more recent periods should bolster its appeal to those willing to take a bit more risk in search of more return.

This makes it a viable middle-ground alternative between purely passive super-low-cost ETFs like VTI and traditional actively managed mutual funds, which often come with higher costs.

Without a doubt, PDP is just one of many ETFs that offer an alternative to pure-vanilla U.S equity exposure.

But importantly, PDP stands out from many in this crowd, as its strong liquidity, hefty asset base and history of avoiding radical risk clearly suggest.

Britt also noted that turnover in the index last year was 96%.  As we discussed in our article Tax-Efficient Alpha, the combination of the tax-efficient ETF structure and our unique relative strength approach to indexing makes for a compelling investment solution.

See www.powershares.com for more information.  Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


PowerShares Dorsey Wright ETFs Reach $1B

January 16, 2013

IndexUniverse highlights a significant milestone for the PowerShares Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders ETFs:

PowerShares, the No. 4 U.S. ETF firm by assets, today trumpeted the fact that the four ETFs it, along with technical-analysis guru Tom Dorsey, brought to market beginning almost six years ago together now have more than $1 billion in assets under management.

Almost three-quarters of those assets are in the oldest of the quintet, the $771 million PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio (PDP), which outperformed the S&P 500 Index last year, PowerShares said today in a press release.

The four portfolios make use of the “point and figure” relative strength technical analysis Dorsey and his firm Dorsey Wright & Associates have championed for 25 years. The funds are part of the ETF world that is focused on so-called strategy indexing that amounts to an attempt to outperform—in a rules-based, quasi-active way—the broader market, as measured by capitalization-weighted indexes like the S&P.

The four funds, their launch dates, and their assets are as follows:

  • PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio (PDP), March 2007, $771.0 million
  • PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (PIE), December 2007, $275.9 million
  • PowerShares DWA Developed Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (PIZ), December 2007, $132.3 million
  • PowerShares DWA SmallCap Technical Leader s Portfolio (DWAS), July 2012, $18.1 million

PDP, the granddaddy of the four funds, returned 17.87 percent last year compared with the S&P 500’s 16 percent, PowerShares said.

The Wheaton, Ill.-based fund company also said the fund has risen 14.93 percent in the past three years, compared with 10.86 percent for the S&P.

“It was a big deal when Dorsey Wright and Invesco PowerShares introduced the Technical Leaders ETFs beginning in 2007; it really gave investors a new way to implement relative strength strategies,” Tom Dorsey said in the press release.

“We believe that money managers will increasingly seek out well-designed alpha-seeking investments like the PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETFs that have demonstrated the potential to improve portfolio performance.”

We at Dorsey, Wright & Associates are very proud to have reached this significant milestone, and want to thank all of you, our clients, for your support of these robust relative strength-based ETF solutions.

See www.powershares.com for more information.  Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


Factor-Based ETFs Growing in Popularity

January 2, 2013

Benzinga makes the case for factor-based ETFs and then uses the PowerShares DWA Developed Markets Index (PIZ) as an example:

A long-standing staple of the ETF business has been, and probably always will be to some extent, the passively managed index fund. An index fund, in most cases, is everything its name implies: A fund constructed using the securities of a specific index, be it the S&P 500, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index or another index.

Since most indexes are weighted by market capitalization, that means most index funds use cap-weighting methodology. Translation: The index’s largest holdings are usually those with the largest market value.

In terms of gathering assets, this approach has worked well for ETF sponsors, but as the industry has grown, savvy investors have sought out opportunities beyond traditional cap-weighting. Equal-weight ETFs have served as a popular avenue for investors looking to escape the cap-weighting rut.

Additionally, factor-based ETFs have increased in popularity. A simple definition of factor-based ETFs is that these funds are not quite actively managed per se, but they go far beyond the passive, cap-weighting routine by using growth, valuation and technical factors.

Obviously, investors will want to know if factor-based ETFs generate noteworthy returns relative to their cap-weighted rivals. In some cases, the answer is a resounding yes, so do not forget about these factor-based funds.

PowerShares DWA Developed Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (NYSE: PIZ) PIZ is the developed markets equivalent of the popular PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (NYSE: PIE).

PIZ excludes U.S.-based companies and its holdings (usually 100, but currently 104) can be domiciled in, but not limited to but not limited to Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

And like PIE, PIZ holds stocks that are displaying impressive relative strength traits. That does have a positive impact on returns. Year-to-date and over the past 12 and 36 months, PIZ’s underlying index, the Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, has outpaced the MSCI EAFE Index and the MSCI EAFE Growth Index.

See www.powershares.com for more information about PIZ.

Posted by:


PIE: Inflow Alert

December 27, 2012

Forbes points out that the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index (PIE) was the recipient of of some rather large flows over the past week:

Looking today at week-over-week shares outstanding changes among the universe of ETFs covered at ETF Channel, one standout is the DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (AMEX: PIE) where we have detected an approximate $60.2 million dollar inflow — that’s a 27.8% increase week over week in outstanding units (from 11,850,000 to 15,150,000). Among the largest underlying components of PIE, in trading today Tata Motors Ltd (NYSE: TTM) is up about 0.3%, Cosan Ltd (NYSE: CZZ) is up about 1.4%, and Companhia Brasileira de Distribuicao (NYSE: CBD) is up by about 1.1%.

A chart of PIE over the past 6 months is shown below:

pie yahoo PIE: Inflow Alert

Source: Yahoo! Finance

See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


Pundit Scorecard

December 27, 2012

The WSJ’s article 2012 Was Good for Stocks, Bad for Stock Pundits reviews the track record for some well known pundits.  After detailing some of the blown 2012 calls by Jim Rogers and Jim Cramers, the article provides the following rather dreary summary:

Neither Mr. Rogers nor Mr. Cramer should feel singled out. The business of market punditry is fraught with potholes.

Of the 65 market “gurus” tracked during the last few years by CXO Advisory Group, the median accuracy for market calls is 47%. If that sounds low, or you wonder about the quality of the pundit, consider that the list includes such well-known names as Bill Fleckenstein (37%), Jeremy Grantham (48%), Bill Gross (46%) and Louis Navellier (60%).

The record speaks for itself. Most of the smartest guys in the room are usually about as reliable as a coin flip. After bombing in 2011 with a prediction that Treasury yields would rise, Mr. Gross, founder and co-chief investment officer of Pacific Investment Management Co., didn’t make any sweeping predictions for 2012 except to say he worried about Europe.

Something to keep in mind while reviewing forecasts for 2013.

crystal ball2 Pundit Scorecard

Posted by:


Dorsey: ETF Revolution Just Starting

December 19, 2012

Want to know how important ETFs are to Dorsey Wright and to our entire industry?  Read this Q&A with IndexUniverse and Tom Dorsey.  Here’s the summary:

Tom Dorsey, president and founder of Dorsey Wright & Associates, can’t say enough positive things about ETFs. His business of point and figure technical analysis is now focused on ETFs, and their role in all that he does will only increase.

When IndexUniverse.com Managing Editor Olly Ludwig caught up with Dorsey on the sidelines of IndexUniverse’s Inside Trading ETFs conference last week at the New York Stock Exchange, Dorsey predicted that one of the four ETFs it created with Invesco PowerShares, the PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio (NYSEArca: PDP), is likely to cross the $1 billion threshold sometime early next year.

That’s hardly a surprise to Dorsey, who considers the ETF the most important financial innovation in his 37-year career in the money management industry, and sees the development so far amounting to the first foot of a 26-mile marathon.

Posted by:


The ETF Is A Game Changer

December 12, 2012

Tom Dorsey keynotes the IndexUniverse Conference:

Tom Dorsey, president of the investment advisory firm Dorsey Wright Associates, which specializes in technical analysis, said the exchange-traded fund looms largely as the biggest financial innovation of his 37-year career.

“The ETF is a game changer,” Dorsey told attendees at IndexUniverse’s inaugural “Inside ETFs Trading” conference today in New York, saying ETFs have given investors previously nonexistent opportunities to gain access to broad swaths of financial markets in an inexpensive and transparent package.

Dorsey, known for championing point and figure technical charting at Dorsey Wright since about 1987, spoke to the crowd of about 260 financial advisors about his methodology, and stressed that ETFs were now at the center of his firm’s business plan and would only grow in importance in the coming years.

“We’re in the first foot of a 26-mile marathon,” Dorsey said, arguing that most U.S. investors still aren’t aware of ETFs and, internationally, ETF market growth has barely gotten under way.

Posted by:


Emerging Markets: PIE vs. VWO

December 6, 2012

As the battle in the Emerging Markets space continues to heat up, Seeking Alpha highlights the favorable performance of PIE as compared to VWO:

Another fund that does not get the credit it deserves for being a thorn in VWO’s side is the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Portfolio (PIE). The knock on PIE compared to VWO is fees. PIE charges 0.9% a year, but the ETF makes up for it. VWO has consistently lagged PIE by margins that are wide enough to justify paying up for the PowerShares offering. Over the past 12, 24, and 36 months and year to date, PIE has bested VWO. Over the past 36 months, PIE has delivered triple the returns of VWO and has been less volatile than the Vanguard fund over that time.

See www.powershares.com for more information.  Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


DWAS Among ETFs Outpacing IWM

November 28, 2012

Benzinga has a favorable review of DWAS, the PowerShares DWA Small-Cap Technical Leaders Index:

IWM’s recent ups and downs underscore the notion that there are other small-cap ETFs that could deliver more upside in a possible risk on rally. Consider these ETFs that have been outpacing IWM in recent months.

The PowerShares DWA SmallCap Technical Leaders Portfolio (DWAS) debuted in July, but its rookie status is not what makes this fund unique. Rather than being a traditional cap-weighted ETF, DWAS evaluates relative strength characteristics of various stocks before including them in the fund. Dorsey Wright selects possible constituents “from a small-cap universe of approximately 2,000 of the smallest U.S. companies selected from a broader set of 3,000 companies,” according to PowerShares.

From there, DWAS is whittled down to 200 holdings. At the sector level, DWAS is heavy on discretionary, financial services, health care and technology names. Favorable seasonal trends for discretionary names have helped DWAS rise 0.86 percent in the past month. Over the past 90 days, the ETF is up 0.94 percent. IWM is down over both time periods.

For more information about DWAS, see www.powershares.com.  Potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss.

Posted by:


Factor-Based ETFs: “A Growing Phenomenon”

October 24, 2012

Our Technical Leaders Indexes were prominently profiled in New Factor-Based Strategies Make ETFs Less Passive  by Rosalyn Retkwa in Institutional Investor magazine.

Exchange-traded funds increasingly seek to rebalance their portfolios without bastardizing the concept of passive investing.

The article also includes quotes by Tom Dorsey and Mike Moody:

Invesco PowerShares of Wheaton, Illinois, offers four ETFs based on the DWA Technical Leaders index created by Dorsey Wright & Associates of Richmond, Virginia. That index measures the relative strength or momentum in stocks to pick out the top 100 stocks in three categories — large- and midcap U.S. stocks (PDP), developed markets ex-U.S. (PIZ), and emerging markets (PIE) — and the top 200 small-cap stocks (DWAS). All four are reweighted quarterly.  “We could have chosen weekly or monthly, but quarterly worked out the best for us in our test,” says Tommy Dorsey, a principal in the firm, emphasizing that the selection of the “leaders” is all machine-driven, “with no human intervention. What’s taken out of the equation is human emotion. It’s all rules-activated.” Dorsey believes that ETFs “should stop short of being active and trying to compete with mutual funds,” because once they become actively managed, “you have that emotion, and that’s where the ETF has become bastardized,” he says.

But “people are experimenting and trying a lot of different things,” says Mike Moody, a senior portfolio manager at Dorsey Wright Money Management, the Pasadena, California–based asset management arm of the Richmond firm. “In just the last few years, there’s been an explosion with both academics and practitioners discussing how factor-based returns combine in a portfolio,” he says. “The dominant method for a long time has been characterizing equity through style boxes — small cap, large cap — and they’re all pretty highly correlated, but if you take that universe and you add in factors like low volatility and relative strength, they don’t have the same correlation,” he says.

See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


Where Do You Get Your News?

September 27, 2012

While this will probably surprise no one (who has been conscious over the past decade), it is still pretty fascinating.

news 1 Where Do You Get Your News?

Trends are everywhere.  You just need a plan to capitalize on them.

HT: Michael Kitces

Posted by:


Technical Leaders in the News

September 14, 2012

Stoyan Bojinov of ETFdb on the PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders ETFs (PDP, PIE, PIZ, DWAS):

Countless investors have embraced ETFs in their portfolios thanks to the cost-efficient and easy-to-use nature of these financial instruments. Aside from serving as excellent core building blocks in long-term and retirement-themed portfolios, ETFs have also gained popularity among investors seeking out tactical exposure. One particular breed of products from industry veteran PowerShares has continued to slip under the radar for many, although a closer look under the hood reveals some attractive opportunities.

Invesco PowerShares offers a suite of “Technical Leaders” ETFs which target a number of popular asset classes with a twist; these products employ a proprietary methodology that allows them to sort through thousands of securities and narrow down their basket of holdings to only the ones which satisfy certain criteria. The result is a shallower portfolio that is deemed to hold only the strongest components from each respective universe based on relative performance measures.

Click here for the whole article and for the performance comparisons of the ETFs verses their benchmarks.

See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


Mexico: The Forgotten Emerging Market

August 21, 2012

Charles Sizemore sings praises for “the forgotten emerging market:”

Mexico gets no love. It’s not quite a developed market, but being next door to the United States it’s not quite remote or exotic enough to be an alluring emerging market either. And starting with the letter “M,” it doesn’t fit into any popular acronyms.

Lest you think I am joking, the four countries that comprise the “BRIC”—Brazil, Russia, India and China—have nothing in common other than the fact that their first letters make a word that sounds good in marketing literature. Mexico, Turkey, and Indonesia would all have been better choices than Russia—all three are promising emerging markets whereas Russia is a decrepit petrostate on the decline—but it’s hard to form an acronym with their first letters. Go ahead. Try. I’m waiting.

Investors who overlook Mexico do so to their own detriment. In addition to being an attractive market in its own right—and the second-largest in Latin America after Brazil—Mexico is also a large investor in other Latin American markets, and some of its multinational companies have a truly global scope.

The Mexican stock market has also been a star performer in 2012. At time of writing, the Mexican IPC Stock Index was up over 10 percent, making it one of the better performing markets in the Americas.

Mexico’s relatively strong performance has not been lost on the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Index (PIE).  As shown below, PIE current has 9.27% exposure to Mexico (while VWO, its cap-weighted benchmark only gives 5% weight to Mexico).

pie 1 Mexico: The Forgotten Emerging Market

Source: PowerShares

See www.powershares.com for more information.  A list of all holding for the last 12 months is available upon request.

HT: Abnormal Returns

Posted by:


PIE In The News

August 6, 2012

Benzinga profiles the current allocation and performance of the PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets Technical Leaders ETF (PIE):

Over the past year and year-to-date, PIE has outperformed its larger rivals, indicating that there is indeed something to focusing on relative strength. It is also worth noting that over the past three years, the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, the index PIE tracks, has sharply outpaced the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, the index VWO and EEM track.

See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


PDP in the News

June 26, 2012

Bloomberg has an article today entitled “ETFs Passive No More.”  It’s an article about the rise of intelligent indexation.  Here’s their thesis:

Exchange-traded funds are posing a new threat to the $7.8 trillion market for active mutual funds by challenging the notion ETFs are only good for tracking benchmarks.

Here’s their blurb about PDP:

The PowerShares DWA fund, which invests in U.S.-listed companies, uses an index that selects them based on “relative strength,” a proprietary screening methodology developed by Richmond, Virginia-based Dorsey, Wright & Associates Inc. The fund has advanced at an annual rate of 2 percent since its inception in March 2007, compared with the 1.2 percent gain for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same period, and the 3.8 percent increase in the Russell 3000 Growth Index.

Their offerings may further erode the market share of active mutual funds, sold by traditional money managers such as Fidelity Investments, Capital Group Cos. and Franklin Resources Inc. The companies tout the ability of their managers to beat benchmarks mostly through individual security selection.

“Historically, active managers held a unique appeal to prospective investors,” said Steven Bloom, who helped develop the first ETF in the 1980s and is now an assistant professor of economics at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York.“Now, ETFs are infringing on that territory by holding out the prospect of alpha.”

The article points out that by using a rules-based investment process within an ETF, you can shoot for alpha, while getting the tax benefits of the ETF structure.  Rules-based ETFs are going to continue to blur the line with active mutual funds over time.  It’s also going to be interesting to see how many of the rules-based processes are robust and how many have been optimized.  Curve-fitted performance will tend to degrade over time, while a truly adaptive model should be more consistent.

We think the trend toward intelligent indexes will continue and we’re excited to be one of the pioneers.

See www.powershares.com for more information about PDP.  Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.  A list of all holdings for the trailing 12 months is available upon request.

Posted by:


Howard Ruff: Marketing Genius

June 25, 2012

Howard Ruff is quite the marketing genius.  His 1979 book might have been terrible investment advice, but he clearly knows how to sell books.

ruff Howard Ruff: Marketing Genius

Published in 1979

And right in the depths of despair of 2008, he rolled it out again (with a slightly changed title).

ruff2 Howard Ruff: Marketing Genius

Published in 2008

Alhambra Investment Partners concluded their entertaining read The Apocalypse Bubble with the following:

I know it isn’t popular to be optimistic right now. A book about our bright economic future couldn’t even get published right now much less make the best seller list. But the best seller list is a lousy place to get investment advice. One of the most popular financial advice writers of the late 70s was Howard Ruff whose book How To Prosper During the Coming Bad Years was a best seller in 1979. He followed that up with Survive and Win in the Inflationary Eighties (1981). He recently updated his first best seller by adding In the 21st Century to the title. While you ponder the significance of that contrarian nugget, you might also consider the possibility that the Mayan calendar ends where it does because they ran out of government funding.

HT: Abnormal Returns

Posted by:


Canada Missing In EAFE, But Not In PIZ

June 6, 2012

Number 30 on ETFdb’s list of “101 ETF Lessons Every Financial Advisor Should Learn” points out that Canada is not represented in the MSCI EAFE ETFs.

30. Canada Isn’t In EAFE ETFs

Canada is a dynamic economy home to a relatively strong, stable banking system, and has massive natural resource reserves that uniquely position it to thrive from the growing demand from emerging markets. But, believe it or not, many supposedly well-diversified portfolios overlook this economy entirely. That’s because it isn’t included in the EAFE region that is covered by funds such as EFA and VEA. Though investors generally think of the EAFE as broadly including developed markets outside the United States, it is actually a gathering of developed economies that excludes North America.

So, what options are there for investors who want exposure to developed international markets, including Canada?  Look no further than our own PowerShares DWA Developed International Technical Leaders ETF (PIZ).  Canada currently has an allocation of 11.10% in PIZ.

piz 2 Canada Missing In EAFE, But Not In PIZ

Source: PowerShares

The fact that Canada has been relatively strong in recent years and has therefore had a healthy allocation in PIZ has been part of the reason that PIZ has outperformed EFA and VEA since the major bear market low.

piz2 Canada Missing In EAFE, But Not In PIZ

Source: Yahoo! Finance (3/9/09 – 6/5/12)

See www.powershares.com for more information about PIZ.  A list of all holdings for the trailing 12 months is available upon request.

Posted by:


RS White Paper: SSRN’s Top Ten Downloaded

February 17, 2012

We were just notified that John Lewis’ white paper Relative Strength and Portfolio Management was recently listed on SSRN’s Top Ten downloaded list for All SSRN Journals!  Click here to access the paper.

This is not just another academic white paper on relative strength (although those are certainly also of value).  Rather, this white paper details our Monte Carlo-based testing process that has been instrumental in understanding and verifying the robust nature of relative strength.

SSRN RS White Paper: SSRNs Top Ten Downloaded

Posted by:


Relative Strength–A Critical Portfolio Management Tool

February 13, 2012

Mike Moody’s Relative Strength–A Critical Portfolio Management Tool now appears in the current issue of IMCA’s Journal of Investment Consulting.  Whether you are managing relative strength portfolios yourself or you are employing relative strength strategies, this article answers the essential questions:

  • What is relative strength?
  • Why does it work?
  • Where does it work?
  • What have been the results?
  • What are its drawbacks?
  • How does it fit in an asset allocation?

Click here to read the article.

imca2 Relative Strength  A Critical Portfolio Management Tool

 

Posted by:


From One Who Knows

December 22, 2011

MarketWatch’s Chuck Jaffe:

Years of working in the media have convinced me that a large measure of market talk about “what moved the market today” is hogwash. Truthfully, if the market moves by a percentage point or two on any given day, most pundits are taking nothing more than an educated guess as to what caused the move. They know their thinking —right or wrong — will be largely forgotten the next day, when there will be another opportunity to say something that sounds smart (thereby making the investment firm sound smart, no matter how accurate the information).

Thankfully, there are better alternatives to investing based on the daily opinions of journalists.

Posted by: