The Dollar and the Bear in the Woods

December 21, 2009

There is an old joke about two hiking buddies who inadvertently startle a bear cub deep in the woods. As the enormous, and now angry, mama bear wheels and prepares to charge, one of the hikers quickly sheds his backpack. “You’ll never be able to outrun that bear,” his buddy tells him. “I know,” he replies, “but I don’t need to outrun the bear. I just need to outrun you.”

Such is the current situation of the U.S. dollar, which is currently hitting recent highs against the yen and euro. Has the fiscal responsibility of the U.S. suddenly improved in a material way? No. Has our deficit been reduced? No—in fact, it is larger than before. So what, then, accounts for the recent strength in the dollar?

After the recent downgrade of Greece, investors became focused on the fiscal problems of Europe. In addition to Greece, Spain and Italy also have large public sector debts that are rapidly growing. And all of a sudden, the U.S. dollar doesn’t look so bad on a relative basis.

This speaks to the power of relative strength analysis in financial markets. The dollar may not be able to outrun the bear in the woods, but right now it just needs to outrun the euro. Investors everywhere always face a dilemma: where should I put my excess capital? After all, it has to go somewhere. The decision is always a relative one—what is the best choice among the options I have? Our Systematic RS accounts take advantage of this relative decision process by constantly measuring the relative performance of stocks or asset classes and attempting to focus the portfolio in assets that have been strong. Relative strength analysis allows the investor to see, from a pure supply and demand standpoint, uncluttered by rhetoric, what decisions have been made in aggregate and allows the investor to follow the trend.

Posted by:


Anti-Equity Sentiment

December 21, 2009

Time will tell whether Institutional Investor’s Julie Segal was prophetic or just susceptible to well-know behavioral finance tendencies in her article, The Equity Culture Loses Its Bloom, in which she gives a host of reasons why there is no hope for equities going forward. However, I think she has accurately captured the current fears of many investors.

As investment moves away from equities, speculation will likewise shift from stocks to other investments, including real estate, commodities and currencies. “The money supply won’t shrink, and those dollars will need a home,” says Bove. Alternatives will continue to attract money from investors’ erstwhile equity allocations.

Surely, the mindset explained in the article goes a long ways toward explaining why there has been so much demand for our Global Macro strategy this year, which can invest in U.S. equities (long & inverse), international equities (long & inverse), currencies, commodities, real estate, and fixed income. Global Macro is available as a separate account and through the Arrow DWA Tactical Fund (DWTFX). The Global Macro portfolio comes along with a systematic method for determining when and how much exposure to take in various asset classes as conditions change.

Click here to visit ArrowFunds.com for a prospectus & disclosures. Click here for disclosures from Dorsey Wright Money Management.

Posted by:


What They Were Saying 10 Years Ago

December 21, 2009

There are a lot of articles floating around right now reviewing the market forecasts of ten years ago, such as this one by Brett Arends in the WSJ.

Hands up if you had Southwestern Energy.

No? How about XTO Energy? Range Resources? Precision Castparts?

You should have. These were top stocks of the decade in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. Ten years ago, the smartest thing you could have done with your money was to invest in these. Each $1,000 invested then would be worth tens of thousands today.

Now look at the stocks the experts told you to buy instead.

The most widely recommended — according to a quick survey at the time in the Washington Post — were America Online, Cisco Systems, Qualcomm, MCI WorldCom, Lucent Technology and Texas Instruments.

Ahem.

Any people who invested in that portfolio have lost about two-thirds of their money. The average stock picked at random was up 3%, including dividends

The best investments are usually the ones nobody is talking about. Ten years ago, everybody was talking about which technology stocks to buy. Almost nobody was talking about gold. The Bank of England could barely give the stuff away at $260 an ounce.

Why are people so fascinated with trying to forecast the future? I don’t get it. The track record of forecasters is utterly pathetic. Do people not know that there are more enlightened methods of investing? The data supporting trend-following, including the compilation on our website, is legion. Trend following has warts as well, but those can be relatively easily understood and should be evaluated within the context of long-term results. Those investors who accept the limitations of trend following, and commit to the process for the long-run, are in a remarkably better position that those who try to divine the impossible.

Posted by:


Weekly RS Recap

December 21, 2009

The table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap U.S. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return. Those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength. Relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong.

Last week’s performance (12/14/09 – 12/18/09) is as follows:

There was very little separation in performance between the different relative strength quartiles last week. This continues a trend that we have seen over the last couple months where relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards have performed very similarly. This is a big change from the dramatic outperformance seen in the relative strength laggards in the initial thrust off the March lows. I suspect that the further that we get from the March lows, the better relative strength strategies will perform.

Posted by: