Monetary Base and Inflation

December 28, 2009

Bill Tedford is a market-beating bond manager at Stephens Inc. A recent Wall Street Journal article profiled his market outlook for higher inflation. Although I was not familiar with Mr. Tedford, the article had an interesting comment on his thoughts about the linkage between the monetary base and subsequent inflation.

The key data point in Mr. Tedford’s model: the monetary base, basically money circulating through the public or reserves banks on deposit with the Federal Reserve. Over long sweeps of time, he says, inflation closely tracks increases in the monetary base that exceed economic growth.

For instance, he notes, in the 40 years to 2007 the U.S. monetary base grew at 7.08% a year. Gross domestic product, meanwhile, grew at 3.04%. The resulting surplus monetary-base growth of 4.04% closely matches CPI and the personal-consumption-expenditures price index, another measure of overall inflation.

I always love models that are based on actual data, so that’s a pretty interesting relationship. Of course, recently the monetary base has exploded. According to the article, the monetary base has grown 11% in the past 15 months, during which GDP has actually declined 2%. The article also notes some caveats to his thesis, but it’s intriguing nonetheless.

One troubling aspect of recent media coverage is this: quite a few notable bond managers including Bill Gross, Dan Fuss, and now Mr. Tedford expect bond yields to go higher (and thus prices to decline) at the same time that the public is piling into bond funds. It’s too early to tell how things will really work out, but it certainly something to keep a close watch on.

Posted by:


Econ 101

December 28, 2009

As every Econ 101 student learns, people respond to incentives and the Federal Reserve has created some of the strongest incentives possible with their policy of keeping interest rates near zero. As discussed in this NYT article, millions of Americans are paying a high price for a safe place to put their money: extremely low interest rates on savings accounts and certificates of deposit.

Mr. Gross said he read his monthly portfolio statement twice because he could not believe that the line “Yield on cash” was 0.01 percent. At that rate, he said, it would take him 6,932 years to double his money.

As the sting of market losses in 2008 fades with time, coupled with no reward for saving money, the continued flight to risky assets like stocks, real estate, and commodities, seems highly likely.

Posted by:


Weekly RS Recap

December 28, 2009

The table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap U.S. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return. Those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength. Relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong.

Last week’s performance (12/21/09 – 12/24/09) is as follows:

High RS stocks outperformed the universe by a healthy margin in what was a huge up-week for the market.

Posted by: