Performance Persistence

Using a survivor bias free mutual fund database, S&P Global Research reports that using the past five years’ annual returns as well as cumulative five-year historical returns to find future winners is roughly equivalent to rolling the dice.

Over the five years ending September 2009, only 15 (4.27%) large-cap funds, 7 (3.98%) mid-cap funds, and 21 (9.13%) small-cap funds maintained a top-half ranking over 5 consecutive 12-month periods. No large- or mid-cap funds, and only one small-cap fund, maintained a top-quartile ranking over the same period.

So, if selecting funds based on short-term performance, even 5-year performance, isn’t the key to finding future winners, what is? When seeking to select winning strategies, there is no substitute for looking at much longer-term performance histories and doing the necessary due diligence to understand why a given active investment approach is likely to persist in generating excess returns in the future. Then, once an active strategy is selected, expect periodic periods of short-term underperformance.


Be the first to like this post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>