China Tightens Australia’s Monetary Policy

February 3, 2010

In case you are not convinced that we have a new world order, here is an interesting tidbit from the Wall Street Journal. On Tuesday, the Reserve Bank of Australia was expected to raise interest rates. They did not. The Australian dollar had been expecting the rate increase and took a hit when it didn’t happen. The most interesting reason is why Australia didn’t make a rate change.

…[the Reserve Bank of Australia] surprised the market by holding steady at 3.75%, noting among other factors China’s efforts “to reduce the degree of stimulus to their economy.”

You may ask what China’s slowdown has to do with Australia’s monetary policy. It’s pretty straightforward.

Because a reduction of credit in China will ripple through to demand for Australia’s raw materials, China essentially did Australia’s tightening for it.

So there you have it. China is such a large trading partner for Australia that the assumption is that there will be a trickle-down effect. It used to be said that when America got the sniffles, the rest of the world caught a cold. Now, at least in Asia, that role is being played by China.

It’s not clear what the investment implications of the new world order will be, but it’s pretty clear that some traditional relationships are going to change dramatically. Your investment portfolio needs to be broad enough to have the ability to adapt.


The Biggest Losers

February 3, 2010

Just in case you were wondering, these are the types of companies that a high relative strength strategy won’t own on a trip to the basement. Fortune has a nice slideshow on the biggest disasters. Yes, these are blue chip companies, but they’ve been lousy performers for much of the decade. Maybe they will come back; maybe they won’t. A disciplined relative strength strategy might own these companies at some point during their ascent, but as they weaken in price and their relative strength ranking drops, they will get kicked out of the portfolio. A trend-following strategy will not identify the top or the bottom and will miss the turns, but will try to own assets for part of the ride up and to avoid them during most of the ride down.


How To Create Good Portfolio Performance

February 3, 2010

Clay Allen of Market Dynamics has a fantastic, fantastic essay on the process needed to generate good performance in a portfolio. The process is incredibly simple, but most often ignored.

Surprisingly, the key to good performance is the ability to identify those stocks that are detracting from the performance of the portfolio. Most portfolio managers spend most of their time and effort trying to find the next big winner in the stock market but good portfolio performance depends more on finding and eliminating the bad stocks from the portfolio.

Why is the process ignored? Because most investors do not want to take a loss! This aspect of investor behavior is so ingrained that academics writing about behavioral finance have given the tendency a name, the disposition effect. (If you google for it, you will find dozens of articles written about it.) No doubt the disposition effect costs amateur investors untold millions in aggregate profits every year.

Mr. Allen’s essay is an eloquent restatement of a fundamental principle: cut your losses and let your winners run. The casting-out process used in our systematic relative strength process does exactly that. Each asset has a stop based on its relative strength rank. If it falters in relative performance, it is kicked out of the portfolio and replaced. Mathematically, this is the correct way to run a portfolio. The recent White Paper on our relative strength testing process shows that even randomly selected high relative strength stocks will outperform over time, as long as the weak stocks are knocked out of the portfolio on a consistent basis. Managing the portfolio properly is as important to the ultimate result as the research to find the strong stocks.


New Definition of Efficient Market

February 3, 2010

Apparently, the Chinese market is the only market that is not efficient. Burton ‘Random Walk’ Malkiel is now running a China-focused hedge fund. To clarify, a market is only efficient if Malkiel is not currently managing an active fund in that particular market.


High RS Diffusion Index

February 3, 2010

The chart below measures the percentage of high relative strength stocks that are trading above their 50-day moving average (universe of mid and large cap stocks.) As of 2/2/10.

The 10-day moving average of this indicator is 46% and the one-day reading is 52% after falling to a single-day low of 28% on 1/29/10. This oscillator has shown the tendency to remain overbought for extended periods of time, while oversold measures tend to be much more abrupt.