Ken Rogoff Sees Sovereign Defaults Ahead

February 23, 2010

Bloomberg carried an excellent story about Ken Rogoff and his view of how the sovereign debt problems will ultimately be worked out. As you read it, you have to keep in mind that Mr. Rogoff was the former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund and thus has had a front-row seat to numerous sovereign defaults in the past. In addition, he and Carmen Reinhart wrote what is certainly the most data-heavy treatment of the last 800 years of financial crises and their aftermath, This Time is Different.

Rogoff was speaking at a conference in Tokyo and painted a bleak picture for sovereign debt.

Following banking crises, “we usually see a bunch of sovereign defaults, say in a few years,” Rogoff, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, said at a forum in Tokyo yesterday. “I predict we will again.”

The U.S. is likely to tighten monetary policy before cutting government spending, sending “shockwaves” through financial markets, Rogoff said in an interview after the speech. Fiscal policy won’t be curbed until soaring bond yields trigger “very painful” tax increases and spending cuts, he said.

On the other hand, he suggests that a little inflation might not be so bad given the alternatives.

“Most countries have reached a point where it would be much wiser to phase out fiscal stimulus,” said Rogoff, who co- wrote a history of financial crises published in 2009. It would be better “to keep monetary policy soft and start gradually tightening fiscal policy even if it meant some inflation.”

It’s hard to know how U.S. policymakers will handle the situation, but it is clear that this business cycle is perhaps unusual because of the large buildup of debt in the system. In situations like that, often things happen in an unforeseen way. In the battle for investment survival, now more than ever, it may be important to be able to tactically allocate around the globe.


Crowding Out

February 23, 2010

One of the consequences of overspending is the need to borrow lots of money to cover that spending. The federal government is borrowing, the state and local governments are borrowing, and the consumer is often crowded out. There’s only so much money to lend and institutions and inviduals would rather loan it to the government, for example, as opposed to small businesses. In addition, because there is a lot of borrowing and a finite amount of money to lend, interest rates often get pushed up.

An article on CNBC.com discusses the crowding out issue and its effect on interest rates.

Consumers and businesses looking to borrow and investors trying to find a way to navigate a marketplace heading toward higher interest rates will find the conditions daunting, experts say.

“Clearly the government is not the 800-pound gorilla—it’s the 8,000-pound gorilla in the credit markets nowadays,” says Mike Larson, analyst at Weiss Research in Jupiter, Fla. “These numbers are just so mind-boggling. Really what’s going on is you have intractable debt and deficit problems in the country that neither side wants to tackle in a meaningful way, so the market is doing it for them.”

I’ve added the emphasis in the quotation. It’s a good reminder that markets will not wait around for policy makers to figure out what they want to do. Markets will begin to trade on expectations of what will happen, whether those expectations turn out to be right or wrong in the long run. Markets don’t like uncertainty and they will begin to resolve uncertainties on their own by making assumptions about what might happen and pricing things in the market accordingly.

Right now the market is assuming that there is more borrowing going on than lenders are eventually going to be able to supply. Thus the yield curve is very steep and there is concern that interest rates will push higher. It could certainly work out differently, but it’s important to keep an eye on the assumptions that markets are making.


Relative Strength Spread

February 23, 2010

The chart below is the spread between the relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards (universe of mid and large cap stocks). When the chart is rising, relative strength leaders are performing better than relative strength laggards. As of 2/22/2010:

After being out of favor for the better part of a year, the stage is set for relative strength to re-emerge as a winning investment factor. None of us know how soon we’ll again see a sustained rising spread, but the historical tendency has been for periods of underperformance for relative strength factors to be followed by periods of strong outperformance.