John Bogle is Missing!

March 2, 2010

There is an absolutely hilarious round of letters and investment challenges going around, started by a challege from Roger Schreiner of Schreiner Capital Management to John Bogle. It’s been 193 days and John Bogle has yet to accept.

David Loeper from Wealthcare Capital Management responded in a Letter to the Editor and the accusations are flying. (There’s a link to the original challenge and Loeper’s response in the article.)

Everyone has an ax to grind and the challenges are somewhat tilted, but it’s been a great excuse for Mr. Schreiner to skewer passive investing.

Our investment strategy is to own stocks when the market is strong and sell them when the market is weak. By comparison, the investment process (if you can call it that) of the passive investor is embarrassingly simple: hope.

I’m sure this will not end the active versus passive debate, but it has been good for some entertainment.


Forecasting, Schmorecasting…

March 2, 2010

We’ve written about the uselessness of forecasting in the past and even cited James Montier’s wonderful piece, The Seven Sins of Fund Management. This citation comes from Mebane Faber’s World Beta blog. Montier writes:

The two most common biases are over-optimism and overconfidence. Overconfidence refers to a situation whereby people are surprised more often than they expect to be. Effectively people are generally much too sure about their ability to predict. This tendency is particularly pronounced amongst experts. That is to say, experts are more overconfident than lay people. This is consistent with the illusion of knowledge driving overconfidence.

Dunning and colleagues have documented that the worst performers are generally the most overconfident. They argue that such individuals suffer a double curse of being unskilled and unaware of it. Dunning et al argue that the skills needed to produce correct responses are virtually identical to those needed to self-evaluate the potential accuracy of responses. Hence the problem.

This is irony in action. Knowledge drives overconfidence, so people who actually know something about a topic are more prone to think they can forecast, and they probably even sound more believable. And finally, the worst performers are the most overconfident!

This may be one of the few instances in which ignorance is bliss. If you have the Zen “beginner’s mind” and don’t make any assumptions about what might happen, you’re going to be better off than if you are knowledgeable and try to guess.

Systematic trend-following eliminates the need to forecast (although apparently not the desire, since we have clients constantly asking us what we think is going to happen). We use relative strength to drive our trend-following; it is able to pick out the strongest trends, and those are the trends we are interested in following. We stay with an asset as long as it remains strong. When it weakens, we kick it out of the portfolio and replace it with something stronger. This kind of casting-out method allows the portfolio to adapt to the market environment, as it is constantly refreshed with new, strong assets.

Despite having a logical and simple method that performs well over time and eliminates the need to forecast, soothsayers will probably always be with us-but your best bet is to ignore them.


Relative Strength Spread

March 2, 2010

The chart below is the spread between the relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards (universe of mid and large cap stocks). When the chart is rising, relative strength leaders are performing better than relative strength laggards. As of 3/1/2010:

After being out of favor for the better part of a year, the stage is set for relative strength to re-emerge as a winning investment factor. The RS Spread has just broken above its 50 Day Moving Average.