Dorsey, Wright Sentiment Survey Results — 4/9/2010

April 19, 2010

Our sentiment survey was open from 4/9/2010 through 4/15. The response rate was not bad–we had 79 responses this week. Your input is for a good cause! If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least two other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. 71.4% of clients were fearful of a downturn, down somewhat from last survey’s 75.7%. Only 28.6% were afraid of missing an upturn, again higher than last survey’s 24.3%. Client fear is slowly abating, which is what you would expect, especially considering how good the stock market has been over the past year.

Chart 2. Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. That spread has narrowed to 43% from 51% last survey. Chart 2 is constructed by subtracting the percentage of respondents reporting clients fearful of missing an upturn from the clients reported as fearful of a market downdraft.

Question 2: Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. The average risk appetite this week was 2.69, little changed from last survey’s 2.71. This question is designed to validate the first question, but also to gain more precision and insight about the reported risk appetite of clients.

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. Right now the bell curve is biased to the low-risk side.

Chart 5: Risk Appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. This chart plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. We would expect that the fear of downdraft group would have a lower risk appetite than the fear of missing upturn group and that is what we see here.

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group. A plot of the average risk appetite score by group is shown in this chart. The fear of missing downdraft group had an average risk appetite of 2.51, while the fear of missing upturn group had an average risk appetite of 3.14. Theoretically, this is what we would expect to see.

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a spread chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread is currently 0.63, slightly up from last survey’s 0.48.

As time goes on, we will get a better feel for the most useful ways to present this sentiment data. This survey we have added the S&P; 500 level in the background. We think it will be a unique sample because, unlike most of the existing sentiment surveys, it employs a third-party rating system, where advisors rate client behavior. As a result, it has the potential to be more accurate than sentiment surveys that rely on self reports. Thank you for participating!

Posted by:


Advice From #1

April 19, 2010

Brian Pfeifler, who is currently ranked number 1 in Barron’s list of the 100 Top Financial Advisors of 2010, on how he runs his business:

“I don’t want to spend my time dealing with jet charters, dog-walking or bill paying. I want instead to concentrate on asset allocation and manager selection — that is more than a full-time job,” he says. “To say I can do more than that is not being honest about my capabilities.”

Barron’s notes that Pfeifler currently has $4.8 billion in assets under management.

It is so easy for financial advisors to fall into the trap of being a jack of all trades, master of none. Yet, the best in the industry find out where they excel and outsource the rest.

Posted by:


The Taxman Cometh

April 19, 2010

The difference between death and taxes is death doesn’t get worse every time Congress meets. —Will Rogers

I suspect that if the wealthiest 10 percent of Americans were surveyed to find out if they believed that the best stock market returns came when tax rates were relatively high or if they came when tax rates were relatively low (compared to tax rates over the past century) that the results would fall on the side of believing that low tax rates and high stock market returns go together. That is certainly what I would have guessed…until I read John Buckingham’s recent blog post analyzing the data over the past 84 years. Using data from The Tax Foundation and Ibbotson, Buckingham pointed out that the average tax rate from 1926-2009 was 46% with a median of 50%. Using that median as the dividing line, here are the non-annualized equity performance figures:

(Click to Enlarge)

I certainly wouldn’t use this data to suggest that high tax rates and big government are the way to go, because I don’t. However, I think it is a safe assumption that taxes are going up in the next decade. After all, the new healthcare legislation will bring a number of new taxes starting in 2013 and the tax on long-term capital gains rises from 15% to 20% starting in 2011. Surely, there are more taxes to follow. However, this does not mean that the stock market has to tank. We have to remember that the stock market even generated excellent returns in the 1950s when the top tax rate ranged from 59-75%! As wealthy investors consider whether or not to commit capital to the stock market in the coming decade, rising taxes shouldn’t necessarily be a factor that deters them.

Posted by:


Weekly RS Recap

April 19, 2010

The table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap U.S. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return. Those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength. Relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong.

Last week’s performance (4/12/10 – 4/16/10) is as follows:

The relative strength laggards had a slightly better week than the relative strength leaders last week.

Posted by: