The Do-It-Yourself Stimulus Package

July 13, 2010

One of the great strengths of a capitalist, entreprenuerial economy is its ability to adapt. Although the politicos in Washington may have no idea how to restart the economy, it might not matter. As long as things are not completely in flux, businesses and consumers will figure out a way to move forward.

From Newsweek comes evidence that conditions for a recovery are being put in place without any help from the government:

This do-it-yourself stimulus has already started. Corporate America’s balance sheet has never looked better, and consumers are paying down debt and bolstering savings. The challenge is a reluctance to spend. To try to jump-start consumption, companies are enacting mini stimulus programs of their own. In years past, teen-oriented retailer American Eagle has given away free T shirts and movie tickets to potential shoppers as part of a back-to-school promotion. This year it’s offering a free smart phone to shoppers who try on a pair of jeans (and sign up for a plan). Chrysler just kicked off a round of promotions that includes zero-interest financing and an offer to cover the first two installment payments. With banks reluctant to lend to small businesses, warehouse giant Sam’s Club has started a program with an approved Small Business Administration lender, Superior Financial Group. Sam’s Club will essentially subsidize a chunk of the loan process to enable its members to borrow up to $25,000—with the hopes they’ll spend the proceeds in the retailer’s wide aisles.

Innovative retailers like American Eagle, Chrysler, and Wal-Mart will figure out ways to improve their sales. Other companies will too. There are always trends because there are always corporate winners and losers-and often a recession strengthens the winners and makes them stand out relative to their competition. An investment policy that makes systematic use of relative strength is well-positioned to be able to separate the winners and the losers.


Dorsey, Wright Sentiment Survey Results - 7/2/10

July 13, 2010

Our latest sentiment survey was open from 7/2/10 to 7/9/10. The response rate was high, clocking in at 151 respondents. Your input is for a good cause! If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least two other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. 94.7% of clients were fearful of a downturn, as negative sentiment surged with the market weakness. The market action of the last two months has pushed investor sentiment to very bearish, pessimistic levels. This is a new high in fear, ahead of last survey’s 85.6% reading and above the previous peak of 92.7% reached on 5/21/2010 . Only 5.3% of clients were concerned about missing an up-move, a drop from last survey’s reading of 14.4%. Overall, we are still seeing a strongly pessimistic outlook in client sentiment.

Chart 2. Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. The spread remains significantly skewed towards fear of losing money this round. This survey’s reading was 89%, up from last survey’s 71%. This is also a record fear spread. Chart 2 is constructed by subtracting the percentage of respondents reporting clients fearful of missing an upturn from the clients reported as fearful of a market downdraft.

Question 2. Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. The average risk appetite for this survey moved in-line with the other stats we’ve gone over thus far. With weakness in the market, client fear has grown and the average risk appetite has continued to shrink. This survey’s average risk appetite was 2.05, down from last period’s reading of 2.29. This is also a new low.

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. Right now the bell curve is biased to the low-risk side, as it has been for the few months. What we see in the bell curve is more evidence that clients are afraid of losing money in the market. Just as in last survey, we have absolutely zero 5’s, which points towards a market dominated by fear.

Chart 5: Risk Appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. This chart plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. We would expect that the fear of downdraft group would have a lower risk appetite than the fear of missing upturn group and that is what we see here.

Again we have a total of zero responses with a risk appetite of 5, indicating pervasive fear in the marketplace. The most aggressive responses from the fear of missing upturn group were only a neutral 3. Only time will tell if these “oversold” emotional conditions will lead to a market rally.

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group. A plot of the average risk appetite score by group is shown in this chart. The fear of missing downdraft group had an average risk appetite of 2.03, while the fear of missing upturn group had an average risk appetite of 2.50. Theoretically, this is what we would expect to see.

In an earlier survey recap, we highlighted the fact that the missing upturn group seems to have a more volatile risk tolerance – their risk appetite as a group seems to swing more frequently and further than the downdraft group. We see this again, with the missing upturn average dropping 45 basis points from 2.95 to 2.50, versus only a 15 basis point move in the downdraft group, from 2.18 to 2.03.

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a spread chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread is currently .47, showing modest compression from last survey’s reading of .77.

This round of sentiment survey is still suffering from the effects of the market correction that started in late April. This survey was conducted on 7/2/10, near the lows of the latest downturn; the previous survey was conducted on 6/18/10, which reflected an upward bounce. Although the volatility of the last three months has put a significant damper on client mood, the biggest factor in client sentiment still seems to be what just happened over the last two weeks. As we like to emphasize, it’s important for the advisor to keep the client’s eye on the prize – long term performance. In two weeks, anything can happen in the markets, and as these surveys point out, a client’s emotional tolerance for pain can swing just as easily. It’s your job as an advisor to help the client manage his emotional proclivity to shift his long-term investment objectives based on short-term market action.

No one can predict the future, as we all know, so instead of prognosticating, we will sit back and enjoy the ride. A rigorously tested, systematic investment process provides a great deal of comfort for clients during these types of fearful, highly uncertain market environments. Until next time, good trading and thank you for participating!


Relative Strength Spread

July 13, 2010

The chart below is the spread between the relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards (universe of mid and large cap stocks). When the chart is rising, relative strength leaders are performing better than relative strength laggards. As of 7/12/2010:

It is almost hard to believe that this is the same indicator for the entire three year period shown (but it is, we checked…). The RS Spread was very volatile, especially from mid ’08 to early ’09 . It then declined sharply during the laggard rally off the bear market low and it has since laid flat…for almost a year. Relative strength tends to move in and out of favor over time, and I suspect that what we are seeing now will eventually lead to a very favorable environment for relative strength investing.