Recovery From Loss

December 15, 2010

As we near the end of 2010, one might think that investors are focused on the fact that the S&P 500 is on track to post another double-digit return or that it has had a spectacular recovery since the March 2009 bear market lows. Yet, I don’t think that is where investors are focused. If they were focused on the powerful returns in the stock market over the last year and a half, then one would think that they would quit pulling money out of domestic equity funds. Yet domestic equity funds had another $1.8 billion in redemptions just last week, bringing the total redemptions for 2010 to $81 billion.

Rather, investors are focused on what it will take to get back to their portfolio value at the end of 2007. Furthermore, they are wondering when the next 2008 will come along. As their financial advisor, whether or not you believe that another 2008 is just around the corner is somewhat irrelevant. Your clients think there is a distinct possibility that we are not out of the woods with this financial crisis and they are demanding a strategy that will seek to deal with that possibility.

Enter the Dorsey Wright Global Macro strategy. This global tactical asset allocation strategy can invest in U.S. equities (long and inverse), international equities (long and inverse), currencies, commodities, real estate, and fixed income. The mandate of this strategy is to seek out the strongest trends regardless of where they are found. Furthermore, the mandate of the strategy is to have the flexibility to shift into those asset classes that are potentially holding up when all else is falling apart-even if that means exposure to inverse equities.

The chart below can help answer both of the primary questions that investors have: how did Global Macro deal with 2008 and how does the current value compare to the portfolio value at the end of 2007.

(Click to Enlarge)

As shown above, the Global Macro strategy did not experience nearly as much of a drawdown in 2008 as the S&P 500, 60/40 Portfolio, or the 33/33/33 Porfolio. Furthermore, as of the end of November 2010 it is the only strategy of the four that is above its 2007 value. Only after answering those questions (drawdown in 2008 and current value relative to value at the end of 2007) do clients want to hear about how well a strategy can do in the good times.

To receive the brochure for our Global Macro strategy, click here. For information about the Arrow DWA Tactical Fund (DWTFX), click here.

Click here and here for disclosures. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

HT: GF



How Not to Balance the Budget

December 15, 2010

I’m not claiming that I have any fool-proof solution to balance the budget, but I was intrigued to read this article in the Wall Street Journal detailing the historical experience of tax increases and spending. In a conclusion that will surprise no one:

In the late 1980s, one of us, Richard Vedder, and Lowell Gallaway of Ohio University co-authored a often-cited research paper for the congressional Joint Economic Committee (known as the $1.58 study) that found that every new dollar of new taxes led to more than one dollar of new spending by Congress. Subsequent revisions of the study over the next decade found similar results.

We’ve updated the research. Using standard statistical analyses that introduce variables to control for business-cycle fluctuations, wars and inflation, we found that over the entire post World War II era through 2009 each dollar of new tax revenue was associated with $1.17 of new spending. Politicians spend the money as fast as it comes in—and a little bit more.

I put the good part in bold. Clearly, we need some way to encourage savings and investment-consumption doesn’t seem to be a problem!


How to Own Commodities

December 15, 2010

Quite possibly the only intelligent way to own commodities is as a part of a tactical allocation program. Why is that? Their expected long-run real return is zero. If you agree with this conclusion, which comes from Dylan Grice at Societe Generale, it won’t pay to stick a commodity plug into a portfolio as part of a strategic allocation. You want to own various commodities when they are strong and to avoid them otherwise.


How Global Should You Go?

December 15, 2010

Here is some interesting data from a recent Fortune article How Global Should You Go?

  • For decades Americans gorged on U.S. stocks and barely touched foreign ones.
  • The MSCI All Country World index, which holds market-capitalization-weighted stakes in indexes across the globe, now has 60% of its portfolio in non-U.S. stocks.
  • The average allocation to emerging markets is 6%, according to Vanguard.
  • Despite being scaldingly hot in 2009, emerging-markets stocks are still cheaper than those in developed countries. They’re trading at about 15 times normalized profits, compared with 19 for the U.S. and 17 for Europe, according to Ben Inker, head of asset allocation at GMO.
  • And a recent study from Birinyi Associates shows that the S&P 100 stocks that garner at least 60% of their revenue from overseas are up 18% so far this year, vs. 7% for the overall index.
  • The S&P 500 has been globalized for years, but it has still underperformed the MSCI Emerging Markets index by more than 10% annually over the past decade.

I would suggest that e-mailing this Fortune article to clients who may have inadequate international exposure could be a great way to begin a discussion about making their asset allocation global.

To learn more about Dorsey Wright’s approach to global tactical asset allocation, click here (financial professionals only).

Click here for disclosures. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.



High RS Diffusion Index

December 15, 2010

The chart below measures the percentage of high relative strength stocks that are trading above their 50-day moving average (universe of mid and large cap stocks.) As of 12/14/10.

The 10-day moving average of this indicator is 95% and the one-day reading is 94%. This index pulled back to 40% in August, but since then nearly all of the high relative strength stocks have moved above their 50-day moving average.