Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results - 3/11/11

March 21, 2011

Our latest sentiment survey was open from 3/11/11 to 3/18/11. The Dorsey, Wright Polo Shirt raffle continues to drive advisor participation — thank you for taking the time! Please remember, the first drawing will be held on June 1, so keep playing to increase your odds of winning. We hit a new all-time high of participation, with 206 advisors chiming in. If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least five other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. From survey to survey, the S&P 500 fell by around -1.1%. That was enough to send fear levels much higher, from 79% last round to 86% this round. In the last two surveys, we’ve had total losses of -1.8%, yet we’ve seen fear levels move from 66% to 86%. Classic!

On the flip side, the fear of missed opportunity group went from 21% to 14%. It’s amazing how much a 2% market pullback can affect client sentiment. And no, we’re not forgetting about the tsunami, the possible nuclear meltdown, the Arab revolts, or any other harbingers of the apocalypse. That’s one of the great things about this survey — we are only using price points from one day per every two weeks, so a lot of the “noise” gets cancelled out.

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 2. Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. The spread continued to move higher, up to 73% from 57%.

Question 2. Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. Average risk appetite finally succumbed to the pressures of the pullback, as average risk moved from 2.98 to 2.85. Average risk appetite seems to be holding up much better than the overall fear numbers, given the relatively small move downward (compared to the huge jump in fear levels).

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. The most common risk appetite was 3 this round (again!), with just under half of all respondents.

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 5: Risk Appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. This chart plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. This chart sorts out as exactly as we would expect. The fear group is looking for less risk than the missed opportunity group. Also, note the relatively high percentage of 5′s in the upturn group.

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group.

The fear of missed opportunity group’s risk appetite continued to rise, even in the face of two consecutive down readings in the market. On the other side, we see the fear of losing money lower their average risk appetite, in line with the market.

The upturn group is sticking to their guns, wanting to add risk despite a falling market.

 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results   3/11/11

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a spread chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread is one of the less volatile indicators found in the survey, and continues to rise with the market.

This round we saw a continuation of the S&P 500 pullback, with losses nearing a full -2%. Unsurprisingly, more clients became afraid of losing money in the market, despite a relatively small market correction. Here’s the bottom line for this survey: the S&P 500 is up around 93% since its March ’09 lows, yet a -2% pullback is enough to get 86% of clients scared of losing money! Does that make sense?

No one can predict the future, as we all know, so instead of prognosticating, we will sit back and enjoy the ride. A rigorously tested, systematic investment process provides a great deal of comfort for clients during these types of fearful, highly uncertain market environments. Until next time, good trading and thank you for participating


Economists Are Never Wrong

March 21, 2011

From the people who brought you Modern Portfolio Theory, an update via Paul Kedrosky on Bloomberg:

Two years ago I was at the Milken Global Conference in Los Angeles when Mike Milken, during an on-stage panel with Nobel-winning economists, asked the assembled augusts what they had been wrong about. The world had come unglued, economists were flailing, and it was clear that their models were wrong: Mike wanted to know what they had learned about themselves and their theories that had guided so many countries to the current disaster.

Their answer: Nothing. Well, not quite nothing, but close enough. No one would admit to having been shown wrong about anything. Instead, they mostly argued that if people had paid more attention to them — like literally, each of them individually — the credit crisis might not have happened. But what were they actually, you know, shown wrong about? Nothing. Nada.

It was a remarkable concession. Then again, I suppose it’s unsurprising from a discipline whose theorizing has long shown itself to be impregnable to assaults from data, the real world, or any other such irritating intrusions.

Are you really surprised? I guess it doesn’t matter if you specialize in macroeconomics or finance—no one wants to be confused with the facts. Fifty years after Markowitz, we’ve shown very little creativity in developing new theories about how financial markets work or how to think about portfolio construction. Instead, we have ever more complicated versions of the original theories, painstakingly adjusted for all of the “anomalies.” Finance theorists do not seem to notice that the anomalies now outnumber the things that appear to work.

Maybe investors should spend more time watching how the markets actually behave, instead of worrying about what some theory predicts will happen.


Anne Hathaway

March 21, 2011

…is not the wife of Berkshire Hathaway. But news about her may be affecting the price of Berkshire Hathaway stock! The Atlantic explains how:

A couple weeks ago, Huffington Post blogger Dan Mirvish noted a funny trend: when Anne Hathaway was in the news, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway’s shares went up. He pointed to six dates going back to 2008 to show the correlation. Mirvish then suggested a mechanism to explain the trend: “automated, robotic trading programming are picking up the same chatter on the Internet about ‘Hathaway’ as the IMDb’s StarMeter, and they’re applying it to the stock market.”

The idea seems ridiculous. But the more I thought about the strange behavior of algorithmic trading systems and the news that Twitter sentiment analysis could be used by stock market analysts and the fact that many computer programs are simply looking for tradeable correlations, I really started to wonder if Mirvish’s theory was plausible.

I called up John Bates, a former Cambridge computer scientist whose company Progress Software works with hedge funds and others to help them find new algorithmic strategies. I asked, “Is this at all possible?” And I was surprised that he answered, roughly, “Maybe?”

One more thing for Warren Buffett to worry about!

Source: The Atlantic