From the Archives: Technical Adaptation vs. Technical Prediction

April 12, 2011

“What do your models expect the market to do from here?” Some variation of this question is asked most every day. This type of question generally comes from someone who has not really internalized what a trend-following process is designed to do.

The following section from Michael Covel’s book, Trend Following, addresses this question by explaining the two broad categories of technical analysis:

There are essentially two forms of technical analysis. One form is based on an ability to “read” charts and use “indicators” to divine the market direction. These so-called technical traders use methods designed to attempt to predict a market direction… This is the view of technical analysis held by the majority–that it is some form of superstition, like astrology. Technical prediction is the only application of technical analysis that the majority of Wall Streeters are aware of as evidenced by equity research from Credit Suisse First Boston:

“The question of whether technical analysis works has been a topic of contention for over three decades. Can past prices forecast future performance?”

However, there is another type of technical analysis that neither predicts nor forecasts. This type is based on price. Trend followers form the group of technical traders that use this type of analysis. Instead of trying to predict a market direction, their strategy is to react to the market’s movements whenever they occur. Trend followers respond to what has happened rather than anticipating what will happen. They strive to keep their strategies based on statistically validated trading rules. This enables them to focus on the market and not get emotionally involved.

Since nobody knows exactly what the future holds, the better question for our strategy is what types of market environments are favorable and unfavorable for trend following. Trend-following strategies do well when there are longer-term trends in place. Environments in which stock market or asset class leadership is changing every couple months tends to be an environment in which trend-following strategies underperform. Investors shouldn’t get overly concerned about time periods when leadership seems to be in flux, given that it is impossible to look back in history and find even a decade where longer-term trends weren’t plentiful.

With the understanding that prediction has no place in a trend-following strategy, an investor is bettered prepared to focus on the process employed to adapt to longer-term trends. Focusing on a well-constructed investment process is much more productive than focusing on the unpredictable future.

—-This article was originally published on July 16,2009. We still fall into the technical adaptation camp. And we still see pundits making predictions every day, although their predictions are most often incorrect. Technical adaptation has performed very well since the time of this post. The more things change, the more they remain the same!

Posted by:


Hidden Risks in Target Date Funds

April 12, 2011

This is the title of an article in the weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal that discusses some of the problems of target date funds.

Target date funds are an increasingly popular option for retirement plans. Investors like the idea that everything will be handled for them-yet often they are not aware of what is actually being done within the fund. The overarching problem is that the funds rely on strategic asset allocation and predictably push the portfolio toward bonds as the investor nears retirement. Using strategic asset allocation rather than tactical asset allocation is a dubious premise to begin with, something we wrote about back in 2009. Now we have company from the Wall Street Journal, which weighed in with this:

The market rout of 2008 was tough on so-called target-date mutual funds. Designed to protect investors by decreasing their exposure to stocks and increasing their bond holdings as people get closer to retirement, the funds performed much worse than expected during the financial crisis.

Many funds have responded by ramping up their holdings of seemingly safe bonds. The problem? Some experts now worry that the bond market is headed for trouble.

The move to safety, in other words, could end up putting investors at more risk.

Duh. The reality is that no strategic asset allocation can possibly be appropriate for every investment environment. Tactical asset allocation explicitly recognizes this and makes allowance for adjusting allocations as conditions change.

The article also points out that some of the recent changes in bond allocations appear to have been reactive. In other words, since the funds got clocked in 2008, they subsequently increased their bond allocations to avoid a similar situation. Maybe their ploy will work—no one knows the future. On the other hand, it’s rarely a good idea to shut the barn door after the horse is gone. Usually it just exposes you to a different risk than the one that caused the problem earlier.

For example, if your bond allocations were increased post-2008, it would simply mean that you had a smaller allocation to equities. The big winner over the last two years? Stocks.

Here’s a way to avoid the problens of strategic asset allocation entirely: tactical asset allocation. Instead of assuming that it’s always good to own more bonds as you get older, how about investing on the merits of the individual asset? To me, the tactical approach just makes much more sense. Own stocks and other risky and higher-potential assets in environments when risk is being rewarded and switch to fixed income and other lower-risk assets in environments when risk is not being rewarded. Tactical asset allocation does require constant monitoring and adjustment, but it could turn out to be well worth it.

Posted by:


What’s Hot…and Not

April 12, 2011

How different investments have done over the past 12 months, 6 months, and month.

1PowerShares DB Gold, 2iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, 3iShares DJ U.S. Real Estate Index, 4iShares S&P Europe 350 Index, 5Green Haven Continuous Commodity Index, 6iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond Fund, 7JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Fund, 8PowerShares DB US Dollar Index, 9iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund, 10PowerShares DB Oil, 11iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond

Posted by: