David Ricardo’s Golden Rules

April 20, 2011

Most people, if they have heard of David Ricardo at all, associate him with classical economics and the law of comparative advantage. What they don’t know is that David Ricardo was a trend follower—and made a fortune doing it.

David Ricardo was born in 1772, which ought to give you some idea just how robust trend following is and for how long it has worked. His father was a stockbroker, so he had some familiarity with financial markets. After an estrangement from his family from marrying outside his faith, he started his own brokerage business. He retired in 1814 (age 42) with a fortune of $65 million (in today’s dollars; 600,000 pounds sterling then) and bought Gatcombe Park, in Gloucestershire. (Today, Princess Anne lives at Gatcombe Park, a modest 730-acre estate, described as having five main bedrooms, four secondary bedrooms, four reception rooms, a library, a billiard room and a conservatory, as well as staff accommodations.)

 David Ricardos Golden Rules

David Ricardo: Millionaire Trend Follower

source: www.econc10.bu.edu

What was David Ricardo’s secret? According to an 1838 book, The Great Metropolis, Volume 2, by James Grant, it was what Ricardo referred to as his golden rules:

As I have mentioned the name of Mr. Ricardo, I may observe that he amassed his immense fortune by a scrupulous attention to what he called his own three golden rules, the observance of which he used to press on his private friends. These were, ” Never refuse an option* when you can get it,”—”Cut short your losses,”— ” Let your profits run on.” By cutting short one’s losses, Mr. Ricardo meant that when a member had made a purchase of stock, and prices were falling, he ought to resell immediately. And by letting one’s profits run on he meant, that when a member possessed stock, and prices were raising, he ought not to sell until prices had reached their highest, and were beginning again to fall. These are, indeed, golden rules, and may be applied with advantage to innumerable other transactions than those connected with the Stock Exchange.

The emphasis is mine, although I feel like the whole segment should be in bold!

Timeless investment wisdom: cut your losses and let your profits run! And further, even clarification of what Ricardo meant! If the price starts to fall, sell. If it is rising, stay with it until it begins to fall. Finally, the author points out that these golden rules may be applied to transactions other than those connected to the Stock Exchange. Indeed, it turns out that relative strength investing works in stocks and across sectors and asset classes, both domestically and internationally. And based on the story of David Ricardo, things haven’t changed much since 1800.

I think David Ricardo is now one of my favorite economists.

Hat tip to the World Beta blog and the Au.Tra.Sy blog for pointing me in the direction of this fantastic story.

Posted by:


From the Archives: Pillow Fight

April 20, 2011

Ibbotson Associates has put out, for many years, the familiar multi-color mountain chart of stock returns beating bond returns. They contended that equity returns historically were far superior to fixed income returns, and this was used as fuel by many to hold large equity allocations in every market environment, regardless of client circumstances.

The last decade has not been kind to stocks, so now bond returns have exceeded stock returns over the last 40 years. Various commentators have begun to attack Ibbotson’s position by suggesting that retail investors should just own bonds, since they have done better than stocks. Now Ibbotson is firing back with new justifications for why stocks should do better than bonds going forward.

I’m imagining that when economists disagree on important topics like unknowable future returns that they would pull hair or hit each other with pillows if they weren’t able to write journal articles to fight with one another.

Ultimately, the whole argument is silly. No one knows the future, so it is impossible to know who will be right 10 years down the road. Is there some rule that you have to guess which asset will be better? Why not just hold stocks when they are strong, and switch to bonds (or some other asset) when stocks weaken?

—-this article was originally published 7/22/2009. Now that I think about it, maybe there is some murky, unwritten rule that you have to guess which asset will do better—because pundits are still guessing away.

Posted by:


High RS Diffusion Index

April 20, 2011

The chart below measures the percentage of high relative strength stocks that are trading above their 50-day moving average (universe of mid and large cap stocks.) As of 4/19/14.

The 10-day moving average of this indicator has remained above 50% since July of last year as the majority of high relative strength stocks continue to grind higher. The 10-day moving average of this indicator is now 69% and the one-day reading is 63%.

Posted by: