Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey - 7/15/11

July 15, 2011

Here we have the next round of the Dorsey, Wright Sentiment Survey, the first third-party sentiment poll. Participate to learn more about our Dorsey, Wright Polo Shirt raffle! Just follow the instructions after taking the poll, and we’ll enter you in the contest. Thanks to all our participants from last round.

As you know, when individuals self-report, they are always taller and more beautiful than when outside observers report their perceptions! Instead of asking individual investors to self-report whether they are bullish or bearish, we’d like financial advisors to weigh in and report on the actual behavior of clients. It’s two simple questions and will take no more than 20 seconds of your time. We’ll construct indicators from the data and report the results regularly on our blog–but we need your help to get a large statistical sample!

Click here to take Dorsey, Wright’s Client Sentiment Survey.

Contribute to the greater good! It’s painless, we promise.

Posted by:


Headline: Whitney Loses Credibility as Muni Defaults Drop

July 15, 2011

Source: www.bloomberg.com

That’s the title of an article on Bloomberg today. The lead:

Time is running out on the credibility of Meredith Whitney, who has yet to acknowledge that her eight-month-old prediction of widespread defaults this year in the market for state and local government debt is proving unfounded.

Defaults fell 60 percent in the first half of 2011 compared with the same period last year, including a $12.5 million Austin, Texas, apartment project that made a late payment in June, according to Distressed Debt Securities Newsletter.

Whitney, the analyst who rose to prominence by predicting Citigroup Inc.’s 2008 dividend cut, predicted “hundreds of billions of dollars” of municipal defaults within 12 months in a Dec. 19 “60 Minutes” broadcast, fueling a wave of selling in the $2.9 trillion market. Instead, the number has fallen as cities slashed spending to balance budgets and state lawmakers stepped in to guard against insolvency and local bankruptcies.

There are two big problems with this situation: 1) It’s impossible to predict with any consistency and it’s crazy that analysts just can’t help themselves from doing it, and 2) Just because Ms. Whitney is wrong on this prediction doesn’t mean her credibility is shot.

Her next prediction will be a coin flip, just like this one turned out to be. I’m not picking on Meredith Whitney. None of us could do any better, and she knows a heck of a lot more about municipal finances than I do. The problem is really with the whole prediction game—despite loads of evidence that it is unwinnable, people continue to play. It’s a testament to man’s optimism, I guess, but it can be fatal in the market.

We choose to believe the evidence we can see: price. Why is it so hard for investors to dispense with predictions altogether and just invest where price action is strong?

Posted by:


Real Estate: “Witnessing the beginning of the end of the entire crisis”

July 15, 2011

Mark Hulbert’s recent column in MarketWatch proposes one possible reason why Real Estate ETFs are trading at 52-week highs, despite the fact that the headlines about real estate remain as dire as ever.

According to Cardiff and Horwitz, there are several good fundamental reasons for not dismissing the real-estate market out of hand.

A key one is the steady decline in foreclosure rates. They say that this is an early indication that the real-estate recovery is about to begin. Indeed, they point out, “in the late 1980s [in the wake of the S&L crisis], this was the best indicator for knowing when the recovery was near. As foreclosure rates dropped, the ensuing recovery began.”

According to these two advisers, foreclosure rates began to ease in last year’s fourth quarter. To be sure, that decline has been dismissed by many as being merely temporary, caused by various banks’ freezes on foreclosure actions and massive delays in the processing of foreclosures.

But Cardiff and Horwitz detect at least one straw in the wind that suggests the declining foreclosure rate might be more enduring.

This straw is the falling number of new default filings. Since a foreclosure has to begin with a default filing, such a decline must eventually translate into a more lasting drop in the number of foreclosures.

Compared to around 100,000 new default filings that were recorded each month in the spring and summer of 2010, they dropped to less than half that level beginning last October and have remained that low each month since.

In light of this, Cardiff and Horwitz say that they “believe we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the entire crisis.”

This, then, may be what the recent 52-week highs among real-estate ETFs are reflecting. Though those highs may seem counterintuitive, given how awful the news headlines about real estate have been in recent months, it’s worth remembering that the stock market is forward looking. By the time we read about something in the newspapers, it has long since been reflected in stock prices. (emphasis added)

One of the primary reasons that relative strength models are so effective over time is because they do not wait for the newspaper headlines. Rather, relative strength models often move into new trends well before there are any widely-known reasons for being bullish on a given security.

 

(Click to Enlarge)

Source: StocksCharts.com, Time Magazine

Disclosure: Dorsey Wright currently has positions in IYR, ICF, and RWR.

Posted by:


No Stocks for the Long Run

July 15, 2011

Howard Gold at Marketwatch has an article today suggesting that investors should reduce their allocation to stocks because of all of the uncertainties and because they are more risky that people think. He makes one good point: just because the US market has done really well in the past is not a convincing argument that it will do well in the future. Some companies certainly will, but there is no guarantee on market performance, ever.

One thing, however, is quite predictable: this type of stock-hating article always occurs after a period when stocks have underperformed. No one ever writes about taking your money out of stocks when they’ve been cranking out 15% annually during the good part of the market cycle! As Andy point out in a recent post, it’s probably no different this time. Bonds have done well lately and no one likes stocks—probably time for stocks to outperform bonds again for a while.

Posted by:


Sector and Capitalization Performance

July 15, 2011

The chart below shows performance of US sectors and capitalizations over the trailing 12, 6, and 1 month(s). Performance updated through 7/14/2011.

Posted by: