Sustainable Withdrawal Rates

October 19, 2011

Can a retirement portfolio sustain 4% withdrawals in retirement? That’s the generally accepted rule of thumb, but Dr. Wade Pfau, writing in the Journal of Financial Planning, points out some of the complications in that theory.

Bottom line: current valuations might have a big impact on the withdrawal rates, since what happens early in retirement is much more critical than what happens after a portfolio has had an opportunity to grow for many years.

Dr. Pfau’s findings dovetail nicely with work from James Garland. I do think that it’s useful to consider withdrawals in a relative sense. From an earlier article here at Systematic Relative Strength:

Sustainable spending is a tricky concept. Dozens of studies have been performed on historical data that suggest that the proper spending rate is 3 to 5%. A lot of endowments use 4%, for example. In reality, I think the sustainable spending level depends quite heavily on financial conditions at the time. A stock market with a 6% dividend yield is going to support more spending than a market yielding 3%. In other words, I tilt toward a relative calculation first developed by James Garland. He shows that you can generally spend more than just your dividend and interest income, but far less than your total earnings yield. His rule of thumb is that sustainable spending is about 130% of the yield on the major stock indexes. (You can use this link to find the current dividend yield on the major stock indexes.)

Recommended reading for all advisors with clients hoping to retire!

Posted by:


Another Proof of Market Inefficiency

October 19, 2011

Barry Ritholtz of The Big Picture featured an interesting paper the other day. An upcoming paper in Algorithmic Finance by Philip Maymin uses the momentum “anomaly” to show mathematically that markets are not efficient. An interesting read, but not an easy read. Mr. Ritholtz’s post has a link to the complete paper.

One piece of good news from the paper:

Most finance academics believe markets are weak form efficient: Doran, Peterson, and Wright (2007) survey more than 4,500 finance professors and find that of the nearly 650 usable responses, the majority believe the US stock market is weak form efficient; only 8 percent generally disagree.

If you are looking for ways to exploit market inefficiencies through technical analysis, you are part of a very small minority! I find the belief in any kind of efficiency rather amazing, considering all of the craziness we have all seen over the past decade or so.

Posted by:


High RS Diffusion Index

October 19, 2011

The chart below measures the percentage of high relative strength stocks that are trading above their 50-day moving average (universe of mid and large cap stocks.) As of 10/18/11.

The 10-day moving average of this indicator is 69% and the one-day reading is 85%-well above the washed-out levels of mid-August.

Posted by: