Transcending the Style Box

August 11, 2015

Traditionally, Growth indexes give you exposure to “U.S. companies whose earnings are expected to grow at an above-average rate relative to the market” and Value indexes give you exposure to “U.S. companies that are thought to be undervalued by the market relative to comparable companies.” So which is better? Depends on the time frame. Markets can go through long stretches of favoring one over the other. Here is how the last 15 years have looked:

growth value Transcending the Style Box

Source: Dorsey Wright, Price returns only, not inclusive of dividends or all transaction costs, IWF used for Russell 1000 Growth and IWD used for Russell 1000 Value

Part of the appeal of a momentum strategy is that it sidesteps the unnecessary restrictions of the style box. Take the PowerShares DWA Momentum ETF (PDP). This ETF is based on a momentum index constructed by taking a universe of about 1,000 U.S. Mid and Large Cap stocks and identifying the 100 with the best momentum characteristics (according to our rankings). PDP is rebalanced on a quarterly basis.

The relative strength ranking process used to construct the index used for PDP pays no attention to whether or not a stock is a “Growth” stock or a “Value” stock. Rather, a stock simply has to be relatively strong. As shown in the chart below, the correlation of Momentum (PDP) to Growth (IWF) and Value (IWD) over time changes.

correlation Transcending the Style Box

Source: Yahoo! Finance. Returns used for this were total returns, inclusive of dividends, but not all transaction costs.

Notice how in recent years the correlation of Momentum to Value has been lower than it was in the first couple years of PDP’s history. Why is that? Because Growth stocks have generally been performing better than Value stocks in recent years so our relative strength ranking process leads us to those stocks.

What does this mean for an investor? I think it could mean that an investment in a Momentum Index is likely to be more adaptive than an investment in a style-specific index. Ultimately, I think the ability to adapt to different market environments is key for investment success over time.

The relative strength strategy is NOT a guarantee. There may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. Dorsey Wright is the index provider for PDP and a suite of other Momentum ETFs at PowerShares. See www.powershares.com for more information.

Posted by:


The Exception to the Rule

August 11, 2015

Most professional athletes seem to blow through millions in the blink of an eye. Not Ryan Broyles:

Ryan Broyles grabs his cell phone every morning over breakfast and pores over the latest transactions. What the Detroit Lions wide receiver is looking at, though, has nothing to do with football.

Over the past three-plus years, Broyles has become immersed in the financial world. His financial planning throughout his career allowed him to make a lot of investments. So when he laments the S&P 500 has “been sideways” most of the year, he has good reason.

It all started after a meeting with a financial adviser soon after being drafted in 2012. The adviser gave Broyles some advice he used to shape his life: Spend as you would like over the next few months. Figure out your means. Then set a budget, live within it and invest the rest.

Broyles signed a contract worth more than $3.6 million after being taken in the second round. More than $1.422 million was guaranteed. But Broyles knew the other statistics — ones reinforced when he went to the rookie symposium.

He knew NFL players, and athletes in general, go bankrupt. He saw athletes blow through millions. He was determined not to have that happen to him.

He came up with a budget. Broyles said he and his wife, Mary Beth, have lived on $60,000 a year, “give or take”, throughout his career. Everything else has gone to investments, retirement savings and securing Broyles’ post-football monetary future.

Broyles wanted to make sure his NFL career, however long it lasts, really did set him up for life.

“Then you know how much you can invest, how risky you can be,” Broyles said, as he enters the last year of his rookie contract with no guarantee he’ll make the Lions’ roster. “Then, when I was hitting the same budget over three, four, five months, it was all right, this is what your budget is and I had some spending money.

“I didn’t hold myself back at all on those terms. That’s what I tell people when they want to start to invest, I tell them to live your life and see where you stand and then pull back. Don’t pull back without even knowing.”

He has no problem driving a red Ford Focus rental car during training camp this year. It’s why he and his wife drive Mazdas — he recently bought a new one — and he still has his 2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer from college.

Broyles wouldn’t go into specifics about his investments — just smiling wide when asked. Despite some big changes in his life this offseason — the couple bought their first home in Texas and had their first child, Sebastian — he doesn’t feel any more pressure to succeed on the field because he has an extra mouth to feed.

“The pressure I put on myself is just being the best player I am,” Broyles said. “I would never play [just] for money, you know what I mean, that’s not my intentions whatsoever.

“Whatever comes, it’s just a blessing. But I got the mindset of a businessman off the field, I’ll tell you that.”

Broyles immersed himself in the financial world. In March, he went to Washington, D.C., with New Orleans running back Mark Ingram to speak to students about financial planning. Broyles worked with VISA and the NFL on promoting a Financial Football video game in classrooms to help teach financial security and planning in both D.C. and his home state of Oklahoma.

“I studied as much as I could,” Broyles said. “Talked to people wealthier than me, smarter than me. So that definitely helps.”

Posted by: