A Little Late

August 12, 2011

From Carl Richards:

He explains in Your Neglected Stock Market Backup Plan:

The stock market is doing what stock markets do. Yet we run around like it’s such a shock. We don’t know when it will happen, and often it’s hard to tell why, but the fact that the market went down shouldn’t have surprised anyone.

To be clear: this is not a problem with the market. This is a problem with us. How in the world can you invest your hard-earned money without a plan for both the good and the bad days? Any plan needs to account for the reality that markets go down as well as up.

Carl’s blog at the New York Times is full of humor and insight, but he often hits the nail on the head when discussing behavioral issues!

Posted by:


An Interview With Mr. Markets

August 11, 2011

From Louis Woodhill at Forbes. Funny stuff. An excerpt to give you the flavor of the “interview.”

Below is the transcript of an exclusive Unconventional Logic (UL) interview with the elusive Mr. World Financial Markets (WFM) himself.

UL: Thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. What do your friends call you? Can I just call you “World” for short?

WFM: I’m nobody’s friend, and you can call me “Mr. Markets”.

UL: Yes. Right. Well. Moving right along, Mr. Markets, there are a lot of pretty anxious people out there wondering just what on earth is going on. The Dow went down 635 points one day, and up 430 the next. We were hoping that you could shed some light on this.

WFM: Look, I tell you everything I know every second of every trading day. The answers to all of your questions are in the numbers I give you. What is going on should be obvious.

Mr. Markets seems to be a fan of our “in price there is knowledge” thesis! And:

WFM: Hey, do you know what this job is like these days? Not only do I have to guess what stocks, bonds, and commodities are worth, but I also have to try to guess what your stupid paper dollar is worth. And, it all changes every millisecond! Forty-five years ago, when you had a gold standard, all I had to do was value stocks and commodities. And, those values didn’t change very much, or very fast. A few points on the Dow was a big deal. And, no foreign currency work at all. Fixed exchange rates! Ah, those were the days.

If I can find his phone number, perhaps Mr. Markets will also be interested in opening a Global Macro account.

The world is indeed more complicated than a generation ago. Money goes where it is treated best and with increased globalization and computerization, the money can now go into just about any asset class anywhere, electronically.

Posted by:


Efficient Market Theorists in Hiding

August 10, 2011

…according to Bespoke Investment Group. In a recent article, they discussed the amazing volatility the market has exhibited lately:

…the S&P 500 has averaged a daily hi/lo spread of 5.33% over the last five trading days. It’s been a truly remarkable trading period, and efficient market theorists are currently in hiding.

Source: Bespoke

You can look at the volatility in a couple of ways.

First, I think it shows how important it is to try to distinguish the underlying trend from the noise. When markets get very choppy like this, you’ve got to have an intermediate to long-term model. Otherwise you just get whipsawed to death.

Second, as Bespoke remarks, if the market were actually efficient it wouldn’t whip around nearly this much. The underlying value of the companies is obviously not changing nearly as rapidly as the market price. What’s going on is pure psychology—market participants trying to handicap supply and demand.

Strategic asset allocation relies on assumptions for returns, correlations, and volatility to generate the optimal pie chart. If you’re just a little off on some of the factors, your allocation can be way, way off. It’s safe to say that a few volatility estimates might have been revised over the past couple of days.

In contrast, tactical asset allocation driven by relative strength does not make any assumptions about returns, correlations, or volatility. It just tries to stay with the strongest trends at any given time. Simple, and effective too.

Posted by:


Adding a 4% Allocation to Brides?

August 8, 2011

It’s hard to repeal the economic law of supply and demand. In many parts of the world, the family of the bride has to pay a dowry to obtain a suitable husband. But in a role reversal, men returning from war in South Sudan have to pay to obtain a suitable wife! From BusinessWeek:

Like many countries, South Sudan, which won its independence on July 9, is grappling with inflation. Only here the rise in costs is measured in the cattle needed to pay the bride price—what a young man gives a young woman’s family for her hand in marriage. It’s a reversal of the dowry payment by the bride’s family, a practice once widespread in the West.

With hostilities over, thousands of men have returned home, driving bride prices up 44 percent since 2005.

It’s not just financial markets that adjust for supply and demand—all kinds of changes are reflected in prices. Price is worth paying attention to, especially when it is different from normal expectations.

Posted by:


From the Archives: A Flair for the Dramatic

August 1, 2011

(Click to Enlarge)

Perfect for a day like today.

HT: CW

—-This article was originally published August 17, 2009. Financial reporters are still trying to scare the stuffing out of everyone.

Posted by:


This Week’s Sign of the Apocalypse

July 29, 2011

From Business Insider:

According to the latest daily statement from the U.S. Treasury, the government had an operating cash balance of $73.8 billion at the end of the day yesterday.

Apple’s last earnings report (PDF here) showed that the company had $76.2 billion in cash and marketable securities at the end of June.

In other words, the world’s largest tech company has more cash than the world’s largest sovereign government.

Kind of funny. Kind of not.

Posted by:


A Visual Guide to US Debt

July 27, 2011

Worth checking out, just to get a visual sense for the magnitude of US debt, is this article.

Amazing, isn’t it?

Posted by:


The Love Affair Continues

July 13, 2011

 

QE The Love Affair Continues

I wish I could quit you, Quantitative Easing.

You complete me, Quantitative Easing.

You had me at hello……

Posted by:


Send in the Clowns

July 7, 2011

Financial Planning ran a recent article discussing the brutally honest market view of Greggory Warren, a senior analyst at Morningstar. To wit:

Warren said the movement into bonds by investors was beginning to resemble the attitude towards real estate in the last decade. “You have people saying now that ‘bonds don’t go down’ just like they used to say about housing.”

Asked what he thought it would take to change this attitude, noting that the price of bonds fall as yields rise, he summed it up by saying, “a rise in interest rates.”

In other words, Morningstar is pointing out that the attitude of bond investors will change only after they get hammered in bonds. Comical (or sad, depending on how you look at it) as it is, that’s the retail investor experience with pretty much every asset class.

They love it as long as it’s working, and hate it after they’ve been drilled—there’s rarely any nuanced or logical middle ground. How about considering a systematic investment process driven by relative strength, instead of waiting until you’ve taken one in the chops?

Waiting to get punched

Source: www.areyougame.com

Posted by:


Satisfying Multiple Investor Goals

June 23, 2011

Source: Wall Street Journal

Posted by:


The Sad Plight of the Fundamental Analyst

June 16, 2011

Perhaps I should preface this post by saying that some of my best friends are fundamental analysts. This excerpt is taken from a funny article on Wall Street dress codes by Josh Brown of The Reformed Broker.

Prospective sell-side analysts should pretty much come in with a brown bag over their heads, eyeholes cut out of course. You will spend the next decade blowing people up with nonsensical calls like “overweight” or “strong neutral”. Your price targets will be based on discounted cash flow analysis which doesn’t really mean anything in the actual supply and demand-based stock market. Getting used to hiding and wearing a bag to cover your shame is probably a great idea, start early.

As he points out, the actual stock market is based on supply and demand. Found at the intersection of Supply Street and Demand Avenue: price.

shy guy man with a paper bag on his head 2 s600x600 The Sad Plight of the Fundamental Analyst

Posted by:


Quote of the Week

June 9, 2011

Until you realize taking a beating is a normal part of long-term investing, you’ll hurt the overall performance of your portfolio—Matthew McCall, Index Universe

This doesn’t require much explanation! Staying with your strategy during a pullback is difficult, and it never gets any easier. But it’s got to be done.

Posted by:


Witchcraft Pays

June 3, 2011

Bloomberg has a great article on intelligent indexing, specifically on Rob Arnott’s RAFI Index and how well it has done since inception. Witchcraft enters the conversation only because of a comment by John Bogle:

Arnott debuted in 2005 a new type of indexing that uses fundamental measures such as cash flow to pick stocks — a methodology that the father of indexing would later denounce as “witchcraft” in an interview with Morningstar Inc. (MORN) because of its similarity to active management and higher costs. By 2011, the innovator’s brand of stock indexing had produced better returns than Bogle’s.

The RAFI index intelligently tries to exploit the value return factor, given that its fundamental weighting scheme has a value tilt. This makes perfect sense to me. When a known return factor is available, why not exploit it, especially when it can be done rather efficiently and for relatively low cost in an ETF format?

The Technical Leaders Index (PDP), also sponsored by PowerShares, attempts to exploit the relative strength return factor in exactly the same fashion. In fact, over the time period that both indexes have existed in common, since March 1, 2007, both the RAFI 1000 (PRF) and the Technical Leaders Index (PDP) have had comparable price returns, +3.97% for PRF and +7.63% for PDP. They are exploiting completely different factors, which may be dominant at very different times, but both have outperformed Vanguard’s S&P 500 fund over that stretch.

There’s certainly no guarantee what will happen over a longer time period—maybe cap weighting is due for a comeback. But trying intelligently to exploit return factors that are omnipresent in the data makes perfect sense. It will be a good sign for intelligent indexing if Jack Bogle is eating Rob Arnott’s dust for many years to come.

Jack Bogle, Eat My Dust

Click to enlarge. Source: stockcharts.com

Posted by:


Eat Your Heart Out, Raj Rajaratnam!

May 24, 2011

Over dozens of posts, we’ve reiterated a major theme on this blog, which is that even the most robust and sophisticated of strategies are tough to implement and stick with, and are likely to underperform the market a certain percentage of the time. Investment managers who can outperform by even a couple of percentage points annually are often household names.

However, a recent study of stock transactions by the same small group of people from 1985 to 2001 found “significant positive abnormal returns,” averaging outperformance of around +6% per year.

What narrow group of investors can consistently and legally outperform the broad stock market? Why members of Congress, of course!

How is this legal?

Posted by:


SNL with DSK

May 22, 2011

Man, I love SNL skits! This one with two inmates discussing Eurozone issues with DSK has some great lines, including the following:

“You know what the biggest Greek export is? Hard Workin Greeks!”

Enjoy.

Posted by:


Ten Secret Warning Signs of Inflation

May 6, 2011

Louis Woodhill of Unconventional Logic gives us ten secret inflation warning signs.

1. You are filling your car up with gas and you notice that the “price per gallon” digits are going up faster than the “gallons” numbers.

2. McDonalds announces that they are freezing the price of their most popular burger, but that they are renaming it the “Quarter Ouncer.”

3. You go to a restaurant in San Diego, and you are relieved to find that the prices on the menu look like bargains. Then you realize that they are denominated in pesos.

4. The Fed announces that they are now basing policy on a new price statistic called “Core Core Inflation”. This new price index excludes food, energy, and everything that went up in price that month.

5. Procter & Gamble complains that the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing is competing unfairly with “Charmin.”

6. People with silver fillings are afraid to smile.

7. The Fed’s Quantitative Easing XLVI arrives before Super Bowl XLVI.

8. Street beggars start demanding euros.

9. Airlines begin requiring that passengers bring their own jet fuel.

10. The Fed announces that they are going to be basing policy on an even newer price index, called “Core Core Core Inflation”. This one excludes everything.

Now that you know what to look out for, you won’t have to worry about being caught unawares by inflation.

Always laugh when you can. It is cheap medicine. — Lord Byron

Posted by:


The Value of a Dollar, in Food

May 4, 2011

From Marketplace, a visual display of food that you can buy for a dollar. Is it more or less than you thought?

Posted by:


Dorsey, Wright Exclusive: Ben Bernanke’s Diary!

May 2, 2011

Here at Dorsey, Wright Money Management, we are lucky enough to have the resources to do a little more research than might be expected from your typical money managers. Specifically, we have agents in the field doing the real work behind the scenes to get us the edge we need to stay ahead in the game.

One of our agents acquired the following slip of paper during some routine “research.” Based on handwriting analysis and the DNA analysis of the tear stains on the paper (it was soaked), we’ve come to the conclusion that this is DEFINITELY Ben Bernanke’s diary…

Dear Diary,

Man o man. March has been so brutal I can’t even take it…testifying on Capitol Hill to those jokers in Congress has done nothing good for my blood pressure. Lucky for me I have been flying to Los Angeles for acting classes so I can speak with a straight face without bursting into tears or rage, depending on who is grilling me. The breathing exercises I learned in class have really really helped me…I hope nobody finds out I’m moonlighting as a thespian just to handle my real job.

The thing that really pisses me off…no wait, there’s three things that really piss me off that nobody can just leave me alone about. The first is obviously the US dollar. I mean I know it’s going to go straight down, but somehow I trick myself into believing that it won’t…that it’ll turn around. It’s an acting trick I learned called Method Acting where I really have to “believe” it’s true, and then it will become true. Or is that The Secret? I get the two confused, but the point is Mind Over Matter. Anyway, everybody knows that as long as we keep buying our own debt and printing cash, each individual dollar’s worth is going to go down. Everybody knows that, right? But then I have to turn around and say something completely different, on TV to a panel of sleeping beauties. It’s rough.

Then there are the jokers in Congress. They complain all day about debt, debt, debt, and then what do they do? Spend more, and then more, and then some more. And this is all somehow my fault? Did I draft the laws that fueled the housing bubble? The way they talk out of both sides of their mouth at the same time is just sick. But, at the same time, they’ve taught me SO MUCH about how to blatantly lie, saying one thing while doing another. They’re a tricky bunch, like I said…I’ve learned a lot from them, but I wish they would get off my back about problems that they started and refuse to own up to.

And then of course there’s the ace in the hole – inflation. Gas prices are going up and food prices are going crazy…lucky for me I like to just chop those two things out of my reports because their prices are a little too volatile for the public to pay attention to (they won’t notice!). Don’t even get me started on gold and silver.

It’s getting kinda late and I have to get up tomorrow really early and go over to Timmy’s house and play some racquetball. Man—it was so hilarious when he got caught not paying his taxes. I ribbed him on that one for weeks.

Sure hope things get better for me soon. Wish me luck, Diary!

Haters Gonna Hate

 

Posted by:


Superman Opens Global Macro Account

April 29, 2011

I think the paperwork came from an office in Smallville, Kansas. Well, not exactly. But it might not be out of the realm of possibility. In a sign that even popular culture is embracing globalization, Superman renounces his US citizenship in his most recent comic. According to a CNBC story:

Superman has started a stir with a declaration in the new issue of “Action Comics” that he intends to renounce his U.S. citizenship…The Man of Steel, who emigrated to earth as a child from Krypton and was adopted by the Kents in Smallville, Kan., comes to the conclusion that he’s better off serving the world at large…

“‘Truth, justice and the American way’ — it’s not enough anymore,” he says. “The world’s too small, too connected.”

At least that’s his story. I think he’s just upset about the declining dollar.

Citizen of the World

Source: www.theunexplainedmysteries.com

Posted by:


Dead Economist Throwdown

April 28, 2011

From FT Alphaville, an incredibly well-produced and entertaining piece on the economic theories of Keynes and Hayek. Trust me, you’ve never seen anything like it!

Posted by:


The Plight of the Dollar

April 27, 2011

Source: www.michaelcovel.com, www.garyvarvel.com

Even budding entrepreneurs are wise to US fiscal and monetary policy!

Posted by:


E-Trade Baby Loses Everything

April 18, 2011

Advertisements on television can make trading in the financial markets seem awfully easy. In this episode, the E-Trade baby apparently got in over his head on a few transactions!

Maybe working with a qualified financial advisor is not a bad idea!

Note: Obviously, this is an E-Trade parody, and not one done by us. I’m pretty sure that no actual babies were harmed in the making of this video.

Posted by:


Vegetable Bandits

April 18, 2011

One of the unexpected consequences of food inflation turns out to be theft! Prices are now high enough that crooks are targeting food. According to CNBC.com, a crafty group of felons pulled off a recent heist:

The high price of produce, especially for tomatoes after the deep winter freezes, has attracted more than heightened attention from consumers. A ring of sophisticated vegetable bandits was watching, too.

Late last month, a gang of thieves stole six tractor-trailer loads of tomatoes and a truck full of cucumbers from Florida growers. They also stole a truckload of frozen meat. The total value of the illegal haul: about $300,000.

The thieves disappeared with the shipments just after the price of Florida tomatoes skyrocketed after freezes that badly damaged crops in Mexico.

I guess you’ve got to be on the lookout for anyone selling tomato basil pasta sauce out of the trunk of their car.

Source: www.photochopz.com

Posted by:


Money Goes Where It Is Treated Best

April 8, 2011

If you ever had a doubt that this old adage was true, consider the following gem from the Wall Street Journal’s Wealth Report:

The family office of the Johnson family, which runs Fidelity and which has a net worth in the billions of dollars, recently moved from Massachusetts to New Hampshire, which doesn’t tax many forms of income from trusts. (Their offices are now a mere three miles over the border, lest they also sacrifice convenience).

New Hampshire, in fact, has become a kind of mini-Switzerland for wealthy Northeast families. Trust assets under management by banks and trust companies up north have jumped 70% over the past five years, to $311 billion in 2010, from $184 billion in 2005, according to the New Hampshire State Banking Department.

The Boston Herald says trust companies are “cropping up like tax-free liquor stores in southern New Hampshire.”

This is true not just in New Hampshire, but around the globe. Money seeks out opportunity and growth, whether it is in the U.S. or not. (Not a bad argument to consider Global Macro as part of a core investment allocation.) There are almost always lots of places that are relatively attractive for investment—you just have to expand your horizons.

Posted by:


New Absolute Return Portfolio Product Launch

April 1, 2011

Dorsey, Wright Money Management has completed work on a new portfolio management product, which we plan to use for separate accounts only. It combines a concentrated portfolio of high relative strength stocks with a collar hedging algorithm that responds to even very small declines. The net effect is that the portfolio will capture all of the upside gains, while avoiding the downside entirely. In testing, the product has been able to outperform and generate absolute returns every quarter, whether the market is up or down. The new account minimum will be our standard $200,000. If you would like marketing material on the new Absolute Return Portfolio product, please call our marketing director, Andy Hyer, at 626-535-0630.

Because the performance is so remarkable, we’ve spared no expense with the glossy, full-color marketing material we have prepared for the launch. We think your clients will be impressed with the material and amazed with the equity curve that can be generated. Losing money is a thing of the past.

Wouldn’t that be nice? It would be great if there were a fund that could capture all of the up and none of the down, but it’s just not going to happen. It’s unfortunate that some brokers and clients keep looking for a manager with those characteristics. I mean, c’mon! If such a fund existed, how hard do you think you would have to look for it? It would be plastered on every bus bench, billboard, and magazine cover! Do you think the manager would keep it a secret, so you actually had to search for it? Yet brokers and clients must believe they exist, because managers who can’t do the impossible consistently get terminated by clients who think they should be able to. [I'm sure it's apparent to you by now that this blog post is an April Fool's Day joke.]

Get real! There are no portfolios that generate market-beating returns consistently. In the Wall Street Journal’s Mutual Fund Monthly Review (March 5, 2007), they searched the Morningstar database for stock funds that finished in the top quartile for each of the past ten years. Although our mythical Absolute Return Portfolio might have made the cut, in real life zero funds did. It just doesn’t happen.

In fact, that’s not how good returns are generated. To get the highest returns requires volatility. Morningstar also screened for funds that had the highest ten-year returns—the average annual return, not the year-by-year returns. The top returning funds for the decade all had a standard deviation in the top quartile. In other words, the volatility goes along with the return. You can’t separate them.

Now, volatility is not the same thing as risk. Volatility just means you have an E-ticket ride, but the underlying slope may be powerfully positive. That’s how our Systematic Relative Strength separate accounts are designed to work. They are somewhat more volatile than the market, but much of the volatility over time should be to the upside.

Frankly, we like it that way. Equities aren’t for cupcakes. If your client can’t take the heat, buy CDs. We want to deliver the best performance to clients over the long term. If your client stays for the long term—and by that, we mean five years or ten years-we like our chances. After all, the only way you can get hurt on a roller coaster is if you jump out. And we are confident that the returns generated by high RS stocks will continue to be there because only a select number of clients will ever take advantage of them. Clients that are too scared to get on the ride at all, or clients that jump out early will have to watch from the sidelines.

Obviously, investing in stocks with high RS is not for everyone. Only an aggressive investor would make the Systematic Relative Strength strategy the bulk of their portfolio. But if your client has other, less volatile, assets in the portfolio, there is no reason that Systematic Relative Strength couldn’t be part—or even a big part—of their growth allocation.

Click here and here for disclosures. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

—-this article originally appeared in 2007, also as an April Fool’s Day prank. I regret to confess we got a number of calls from individuals who were very excited about the product!

Posted by: