May 8, 2009
“So the last shall be first, and the first shall be last.”
Although Jesus probably wasn’t talking about the tendency for the most beaten down stocks in a bear market to become the best performing stocks coming off the bottom, this scripture in Matthew is certainly an accurate description of what has taken place in the stock market over the past two months.
The S&P 500 declined 57% from its peak on October 10, 2007 to its low on March 9, 2009. Over the last two months, the S&P 500 has rallied over 35%. However, the returns of individual stocks has been highly discriminate since the low. To highlight the discrepancy of individual stock returns, consider the table below:
|
Signal
|
Column
|
Avg Return Since 3/9/09
|
|
Buy
|
X
|
28.12%
|
|
Buy
|
O
|
45.72%
|
|
Sell
|
X
|
52.85%
|
|
Sell
|
O
|
102.24%
|
The table above categorizes all of the mid and large cap stocks in the S&P 900 by their Point & Figure relative strength rank on March 9, 2009 and shows each group’s performance since that time. For those who may be unfamiliar with Point & Figure Charting, the following explanation may be helpful:
|
Combination
|
Description
|
|
Buy Signal / Column of Xs
|
Strong LT RS / Strong ST RS
|
|
Buy Signal / Column of Os
|
Strong LT RS / Weak ST RS
|
|
Sell Signal / Column of Xs
|
Weak LT RS / Strong ST RS
|
|
Sell Signal / Column of Os
|
Weak LT RS / Weak ST RS
|
Although extremely unpleasant for High RS strategies right now, one of the virtues of RS is its ability to adapt to new leadership over time!
Leave a Comment » | 
Markets | Tagged: Laggard Rally, PnF RS | 
Permalink
Posted by Andy Hyer
May 8, 2009
The steep losses experienced by investors over the last year and a half have led to many changes in investor behavior. The personal savings rate is ticking up, some measure of frugality has returned to the consumer, and the asset allocation framework in place for many investors is being seriously questioned. Among the changes has been a dramatic reduction in appetite for risk among investors. In fact, 56% of Baby Boomers have now concluded that the stock market is too risky for people their age (San Francisco Business Times, 2/13/09).
This change in appetite for risk is manifested in the floods of money pouring into bond funds, as can be seen in the table below (Investment News, 5/4/09):
|
Morningstar Category
|
1Q’09 Net Flows
|
| 1. Intermediate-term bond |
$24,076 |
| 2. Precious metals |
14,991 |
| 3. High-yield bond |
7,673 |
| 4. Natural resources |
6,765 |
| 5. Short-term bond |
6,210 |
| 6. Municipal national short |
5,214 |
| 7. Long-term bond |
4,647 |
| 8. Inflation-protected bond |
4,551 |
| 9. Municipal national intermediate |
3,423 |
| 10. Intermediate government |
3,395 |
As investors throw their hands up in despair, torn between putting the bulk of their assets in bonds or embarking on an experiment with day-trading financial stocks, I suggest presenting them with the following data. Right now, you may be thinking that you are about to read some fascinating new piece of data. Fascinating is probably not the adjective for life expectancy-data, but perhaps nothing is more important to consider when deciding what changes investors should make right now. The following data is taken from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, updated through 2005.
U.S. Life expectancy at birth
|
Men
|
75.2 years
|
|
Women
|
80.4
|
U.S. Life expectancy at age 65
|
Men
|
82.2 years
|
|
Women
|
85.0
|
U.S Life expectancy at age 75
|
Men
|
85.8 years
|
|
Women
|
87.8
|
Emotions are running extremely high right now, which means that investors are very susceptible to making poor investment decisions. Any radical changes in framework for asset allocation should be done with the long-term in mind, especially now. Keep in mind that life expectancy means that one-half of the sample will live shorter than the expectancy, and one-half of the sample will live longer. After all, it is very likely that many of your clients will live well in to their eighties or nineties. With that in mind, a diversified bond portfolio doesn’t make a whole lot of sense; nor does it make much sense to embark on some unproven trading strategy.
When empirical evidence is used, relative strength and tactical asset allocation appear in a very favorable light.
Leave a Comment » | From the MM, Tactical Asset Alloc | Permalink
Posted by Andy Hyer
