Investors Are Green

April 8, 2010

But advisors rarely mention socially responsible investing (SRI) to them. That’s one of the findings of a recent study by Allianz Global Investors. It may just be that advisors are mostly focused on the investment merits of various items and assume that’s what the only thing there clients are concerned about as well. Advisors certainly don’t want to offend clients by pushing SRI on them, so perhaps they just steer clear of the whole issue. It does seem, however, that SRI is appealing to more clients than you might guess.

In that regard, most advisors are probably not even aware that we run a Systematic Relative Strength SRI Core equity product. The social screening is done for us by KLD Research and Analytics. We simply apply our core equity process to the screened universe. The portfolio metrics are almost identical to the metrics for our (much more popular) non-SRI Core portfolio. Maybe more clients would be interested in it if they knew it was available.

Posted by:


Global Macro Presentation

April 8, 2010

We have just posted a new 15-minute video presentation on our Global Macro strategy to our website. Click here to view (Financial Professionals Only.) This global tactical asset allocation strategy can invest in U.S. equities (long & inverse), international equities (long & inverse), currencies, commodities, real estate, and fixed income.

Posted by:


Updated White Paper Data

April 8, 2010

Back in January, we published a white paper that discussed using relative strength and portfolio management. If you haven’t read the paper (or would like to read it again) it can be found here. (Note: Please see the original paper for all of the necessary disclosures.) The original paper also outlines the unique process we use to test various relative strength factors. All of the data in that paper was updated through 2009. Since we have just finished updating all of our data through the end of Q1, we can update the data in the paper.

The first quarter was very good for relative strength. The data in the original paper showed that the best returns come from an intermediate term time horizon (about 3-12 months). Last year that was very different. We found very good returns for 2009 at very short-term time horizons. A 1-Month RS factor was actually one of the better performers in 2009. Over longer periods, a 1-Month RS factor has been a very poor performer so we definitely saw some anomalies during the huge laggard rally last year. The first quarter of 2010 was much more normal for relative strength strategies. The table below shows the performance for the first three months of 2010 for all of the models we tested in the original paper.

(Click To Enlarge)

The best returns came in the 6-12 month time horizon, which is what we would expect. (For those of you who are confused about the “Factor,” it is not a holding period. It is the lookback period for calculating relative strength. So the 6-Mo Price Return, for example simply takes the 6-month return for all stocks in the universe and ranks them from best to worst.)

The next table shows the cumulative annualized returns for all of the models updated through 3/31/10.

(Click To Enlarge)

The various models keep chugging along! The intermediate term factors work very well. Even when we are throwing darts at a basket of high relative strength stocks we find 100 out of 100 trials outperforming the benchmark over time. As the original paper showed, relative strength models aren’t going to outperform each quarter or each year, but over time they do exceptionally well.

Posted by:


Fund Flows

April 8, 2010

The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Members of ICI manage total assets of $11.82 trillion and serve nearly 90 million shareholders. Flow estimates are derived from data collected covering more than 95 percent of industry assets and are adjusted to represent industry totals.

Net fund flows are shown in the table below:

In a familiar theme, taxable bonds attracted the most new money and domestic equities attracted the least – even seeing modest outflows – for the week ending March 31.

Posted by: