“Passive” Investing is a Big Lie

February 3, 2011

Bespoke has a nice post and some graphics on how things have changed since the S&P 500 price last visited the 1300 area, back in 2008.

People that are passionately committed to “passive” investing often have a hard time admitting/understanding that the S&P 500 is an active index. It has massive survivor bias because S&P is constantly dropping laggards and adding strong stocks. Passive investors often argue that they are buy-and-hold investors, when, in fact, the actual index return is plumped by all of the switches that S&P makes. A true buy-and-hold investor that buys the actual underlying stocks and holds them generally loses money over time! An earlier post that I wrote on this topic generated a ton of controversy, although Blackstar’s findings were echoed by DFA. (There’s no end to the irony in this business!)

If the earlier post didn’t convince you that the S&P 500 is an active index, maybe the graphics from Bespoke will. As they point out:

In fact, 11 of the 25 current S&P 500 members that have done the best since the last time the index was at 1,300 weren’t even in the index at the time.

Yep, nearly half of the big winners weren’t even in the index! Clearly, S&P is adding the flyers. So much for passive investing. Here are the nice tables from Bespoke with all of the gory details.

 Passive Investing is a Big Lie

 Passive Investing is a Big Lie

Source: Bespoke Investment Group

Now, obviously, we are big fans of active investing. Thank goodness that S&P is constantly tinkering with the index to adapt it to current realities! Buying strong stocks is what we do, so having S&P add them to the index is a nice thing. (In fact, the list of big winners has substantial overlap with our portfolios-which we are quite happy about.) Buying an S&P 500 index fund, then, is just selecting S&P as your investment manager. If you choose S&P as your manager rather than Dorsey Wright or another active manager, that’s your call. Just don’t kid yourself that buying an index fund is passive investing-it most certainly is not.

Disclosure: Dorsey, Wright Money Management currently has positions in F, WFMI, CTSH, AKAM, AAPL, BRCM, Q, GR, TDC, NFLX, FFIV, and CRM in various account styles.

Posted by:


The Distribution of Wealth

February 3, 2011

When you can turn on the television and watch riots overseas on a live feed, it’s a little freaky. Some of what is going on is clearly political, but often politics have their roots in money and economics. One of the things that Americans constantly worry about in this country is the distribution of wealth-why do the rich always seem to get richer, and what happened to the middle class? Will economic inequality eventually result in social upheaval?

This article from the New York Times is a reminder of how good we have it. It shows the comparative purchasing power distributions in the U.S., India, China, and Brazil. In each country, there are very wealthy people. In each country, there are poor people. But the “poor” people in the U.S. are about as poor as the richest 10% of people in India! An amazing visual:

 The Distribution of Wealth

Source: New York Times/Branko Milanovic

Posted by:


Prudent Asset Allocation

February 3, 2011

Chris Farrell of Businessweek on the risks of a buy-and-hold approach to asset allocation:

Put yourself in the shoes of an intrepid investor in 1900. Both the U.S. and Argentine equity markets looked extremely attractive. Yet the buy-and-hold investor would have pocketed a small fortune in U.S. equities and would have been essentially wiped out in Argentina over the course of the century. “We don’t know what the equity premium will be over the next 30 years,” says Pastor. “And that uncertainty compounds with time.”

Will the returns of US equities be excellent in the coming decades? I suspect that they will, but is such a belief sufficient to construct an asset allocation? Doesn’t prudence suggest that is is wise to make sure that a core of a client’s net worth is invested in a multi-asset class strategy that can overweight any number of different asset classes-such as domestic equities, international equities, currencies, commodities, inverse equities, real estate, and fixed income-depending on relative strength?

Click here to watch a video about our approach to implementing our Global Macro portfolio, which was developed with the goal of providing such flexibility.

To receive the brochure for our Global Macro strategy, click here. For information about the Arrow DWA Tactical Fund (DWTFX), click here.

Click here and here for disclosures. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


Top ADR Performers Over Trailing 12 Months

February 3, 2011

Although U.S. investors often focus on U.S.-based companies because of greater familiarity, I suspect that many would be interested in learning more about international companies that trade on U.S. exchanges in the form of American Depository Receipts (ADRs). The top ten performing ADRs over the past 12 months, out of our universe, are shown in the table below. As of 2/2/2011.

To learn more about Dorsey Wright’s Systematic Relative Strength International portfolio, click here.

Dorsey Wright’s ADR universe is a sub-set of the entire universe of ADRs. Dorsey Wright currently owns AMRN, BIDU, GENT, GGAL, and SPRD. A list of all holdings for this portfolio over the past 12 months is available upon request.

Posted by:


Fund Flows

February 3, 2011

The Investment Company Institute is the national association of U.S. investment companies, including mutual funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Members of ICI manage total assets of $11.82 trillion and serve nearly 90 million shareholders. Flow estimates are derived from data collected covering more than 95 percent of industry assets and are adjusted to represent industry totals.

The attraction to taxable bond funds continues as they pulled in another $3.5 billion last week, bringing the year-to-date total to $11.2 billion. Domestic equity, hybrid, and foreign equity funds also had positive flows while the exodus from municipal bond funds continued.

Posted by: