40% Undervalued or 40% Overvalued?

June 22, 2011

Prominent portfolio managers, Don Hays and Jeremy Grantham, look at market history and come to wildly different conclusions about whether the US stock market is currently overvalued or undervalued.  Hays says it is undervalued and Grantham says it is overvalued.  Mark Hulbert of MarketWatch stated the difference as follows:

Even if you believe the markets follow a regression-to-the-mean process, you still can conclude that stocks are either as much as 40% overvalued or as much as 40% undervalued.

Although both Hays and Grantham came to their conclusions using regression-to-the mean analysis, Hays used four decades of market history and Grantham went back much further.  Which is right?

Since none of us know whether the market will adhere to mean-reversion norms in place over the past four decades, ten decades, or twenty decades, doesn’t it make sense to adhere to a process that can adapt to paradigm shifts?

Posted by:


What’s Hot…and Not

June 22, 2011

How different investments have done over the past 12 months, 6 months, and month.


1PowerShares DB Gold, 2iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, 3iShares DJ U.S. Real Estate Index, 4iShares S&P Europe 350 Index, 5Green Haven Continuous Commodity Index, 6iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond Fund, 7JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Fund, 8PowerShares DB US Dollar Index, 9iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund, 10PowerShares DB Oil, 11iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond

Posted by: