I’ll Take the RS Weighting, With a Side of Volatility, Please

March 14, 2012

We’re big advocates of relative-strength weighting. That’s how our Technical Leaders Index is set up and it’s performed pretty well. Another common alternative is market capitalization weighting, which is the default method for most of the major indexes. A less common, but also robust, method is equal-weighting. With all weighting methods, volatility should be productive if there is some kind of rebalancing going on. The Technical Leaders Index is reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly to take advantage of relative strength trends, for instance.

Relative strength methodologies are quite volatile and weights rise with the trend. Cap weighting and equal weighting are typically mean reversion methods and weights rise against the trend. The Capital Spectator recently carried an article that showed just how productive volatility can really be. James Picerno, who edits The Capital Spectator, has a Global Market Index, which has as its components all of the major global asset classes. (You can click on the link in his article to see what they are. By the way, he has one of the finest blogrolls anywhere–full of great resources.)

In the chart below, the GMI is rebalanced just once a year, to market weights or equal weights, depending on the index.

Source: Capital Spectator (click on image to enlarge)

For most of the time frame shown, equal weighting outperforms. Equal weighting is completely naive. In effect you are saying, “I have no idea what will perform best, so I will just buy equal amounts of everything.” Fortunately, since—in truth—no one has any idea what will perform best, equal weighting works pretty well. Market weighting, if you believe the arguments put forward by Rob Arnott, suffers from overvalued assets getting large weights. In that sense, perhaps equal weighting is the purer approach.

Why are the rebalanced returns higher than the index returns? In a word, volatility. Regardless of the weighting method, rebalancing takes advantage of market volatility. Investors need to reframe the way they think about volatility. Volatility is not necessarily something negative or something to panic about. If it is harnessed, volatility can be the engine for higher returns.

Posted by:


The Duh Files: Supply and Demand Edition

March 14, 2012

A recent academic paper investigated the relationship between gold, silver, platinum, and palladium prices and demand from precious metals exchange-traded products.

The empirical findings of this study suggest that there is a strong statistical significant positive contemporaneous relationship between the inflows and outflows in the precious metals ETPs and the returns of the underlying metals.

Who knew? Supply and demand causes the prices of precious metals to go up and down. Duh.

I am always amazed when academics “discover” what practitioners have known for generations. Academia does generate some real insights in finance, but this does not seem to be one of them.

Posted by:


High RS Diffusion Index

March 14, 2012

The chart below measures the percentage of high relative strength stocks that are trading above their 50-day moving average (universe of mid and large cap stocks.) As of 3/13/12.

The 10-day moving average of this indicator is 83% and the one-day reading is 90%.

Posted by: