Emerging Markets ETFs

March 21, 2013

Morningstar came out with a piece yesterday titled Are There Better Emerging-Markets ETF Choices? The article discussed the availability of alternative beta funds in the area, and had this to say, in part, about momentum:

While there has been relatively little academic research done on momentum in emerging-markets stocks, it has been observed in this asset class. There is currently one ETF that looks to capitalize on momentum in emerging-markets stocks-PowerShares DWA Emerging Markets (PIE), which was launched in December 2007. Over the five year period ending Feb. 28, 2013, this fund’s benchmark index produced annualized returns that outstripped the MSCI Emerging Markets Index by 155 basis points while exhibiting fairly similar levels of volatility.

Risk-tolerant investors looking for more growth-oriented exposure to emerging markets may want to consider PIE; it is currently the only emerging-markets ETF of reasonable size to provide a growth tilt.

The article also discusses some of the funds that offer low-volatility exposure, but did not mention that the low-vol and high relative strength return factors often complement one another nicely. In the domestic market, we’ve seen that these factors have excess returns that are negatively correlated. Although usage of low volatility in emerging markets has a much shorter history, it’s possible that we’ll see the same thing there over time.

It’s nice to see Morningstar give relative strength some attention!

PIE2 Emerging Markets ETFs

Source: Yahoo! Finance

See www.powershares.com for more information. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Posted by:


Quote of the Week

March 4, 2013

The class of those who have the ability to think their own thoughts is separated by an unbridgeable gulf from the class of those who cannot—-Ludwig von Mises

Orthodox thinking will keep you out of trouble. In the investment industry, if you build a client’s portfolio in rigid conformance with Modern Portfolio Theory, your firm will back you and it is unlikely that you will ever be successfully sued, regardless of how horribly things turn out for the client. And make no mistake—building portfolios based on mean variance optimization doesn’t have a very good track record.

Unorthodox thinking, as uncomfortable as it may be for some, is also the only way the human race advances. After all, nearly every current orthodoxy was once out of the mainstream. It’s good to have new ideas bubbling up, prepared to take the place of our current king of the hill if they can demonstrate their worth in practice. (Theory that doesn’t work in practice isn’t much of a theory.)

I’m encouraged to see factor-based investing and broad diversification advancing at the expense of Modern Portfolio Theory. Relative strength tests well as a return factor, as do value and low volatility.

 

HT to Michael Covel

Posted by:


Combining Relative Strength and Low Volatility

October 12, 2011

The power of relative strength as a return factor has been well documented and that evidence is the reason that relative strength drives all of our investment strategies. However, just because it is a winning return factor over time doesn’t mean that anyone should or will construct an asset allocation composed entirely of relative strength-based strategies. Financial advisors who are in a position to decide which strategies to include in an asset allocation must then decide how to find complementary return factors. We have previously written about the benefits of combining relative strength and value, for example.

However, it appears that value is not the only suitable complement for relative strength strategies. Another option would be to consider combining the recently introducted PowerShares S&P Low Volatility Portfolio (SPLV) with our own PowerShares DWA Techical Leaders Portfolio (PDP).

A description of each is as follows:

The PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio (PDP) is based on the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders™ Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index and ADRs based on the securities in the Index. The Index includes approximately 100 U.S.-listed companies that demonstrate powerful relative strength characteristics. The Index is constructed pursuant to Dorsey Wright proprietary methodology, which takes into account, among other factors, the performance of each of the 3,000 largest U.S.-listed companies as compared to a benchmark index, and the relative performance of industry sectors and sub-sectors. The Index is reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly using the same methodology described above.

The PowerShares S&P 500® Low Volatility Portfolio (SPLV) is based on the S&P 500® Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor’s and consists of the 100 stocks from the S&P 500 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time.

The efficient frontier below points out that combining the two can be an effective way to reduce the volatility and/or increase the return over using PDP or SPLV independently.

pdpsplv2 Combining Relative Strength and Low Volatility

(Click to enlarge)

The table below is also for the period April 1997-September 2011. (The hypothetical returns for PDP only go back to April 1997.)

pdp3 Combining Relative Strength and Low Volatility

Perhaps most interesting to asset allocators is the fact that the correlation of excess returns of PDP and SPLV over this time period was -0.29. The goal of asset allocation is to not only add value, but to also construct an allocation that clients will stay with for the long-run. Rather than whip in and out of PDP, perhaps a more enlightened approach is to buy and hold positions in both PDP and SPLV for a portion of the allocation.

For the time periods when hypothetical returns were used, the returns are that of the PowerShares Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index and of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. The hypothetical returns have been developed and tested by the Manager (Dorsey Wright in the case of PDP and Standard & Poors in the case of SPLV), but have not been verified by any third party and are unaudited. The performance information is based on data supplied by the Dorsey Wright or from statistical services, reports, or other sources which Dorsey Wright believes are reliable. The performance of the Indexes, prior to the inception of actual management, was achieved by means of retroactive application of a model designed with hindsight. For the hypothetical portfolios, returns do not represent actual trading or reflect the impact that material economic and market factors might have had on the Manager’s decision-making under actual circumstances. Actual performance of PDP began March 1, 2007 and actual performance of SPLV began May 5, 2011. See PowerShares.com for more information.

Posted by: