Stock Market Sentiment Surveys: AAII Edition

July 2, 2013

Greenbackd, a deep value blog, had a recent piece on the value of stock market sentiment. Stock market sentiment surveys have been a staple of technical analysis for decades, ever since the advent of Investors Intelligence in the 1960s, so I was curious to read it. The study that Greenbackd referenced was done by Charles Rotblut, CFA. The excerpts from Mr. Rotblut that are cited give the impression that the results from the survey are unimpressive. However, they showed a data table from the article. I’ll reproduce it here and let you draw your own conclusions.

AAIIsentiment zpsb291a50e Stock Market Sentiment Surveys: AAII Edition

Source: Greenbackd (click on image to enlarge)

From Greenbackd, here’s an explanation of what you are looking at:

Each week from Thursday 12:01 a.m. until Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. the AAII asks its members a simple question:

Do you feel the direction of the stock market over the next six months will be up (bullish), no change (neutral) or down (bearish)?

AAII members participate by visiting the Sentiment Survey page (www.aaii.com/sentimentsurvey) on AAII.com and voting.

Bullish sentiment has averaged 38.8% over the life of the survey. Neutral sentiment has averaged 30.5% and bearish sentiment has averaged 30.6% over the life of the survey.

In order to determine whether there is a correlation between the AAII Sentiment Survey and the direction of the market, Rotblut looked at instances when bullish sentiment or bearish sentiment was one or more standard deviations away from the average. He then calculated the performance of the S&P 500 for the following 26-week (six-month) and 52-week (12-month) periods. The data for conducting this analysis is available on the Sentiment Survey spreadsheet, which not only lists the survey’s results, but also tracks weekly price data for the S&P 500 index.

There are some possible methodological problems with the survey since it is not necessarily the same investors answering the question each week (Investors Intelligence uses something close to a fixed sample of newsletter writers), but let’s see if there is any useful information embedded in their responses.

The way I looked at it, even the problematic AAII poll results were very interesting at extremes. When there were few bulls (more than 2 standard deviations from the mean) or tons of bears (more than 3 standard deviations from the mean), the average 6-month and 12-month returns were 2x to 5x higher than normal for the 1987-2013 sample. These extremes were rare—only 19 instances in 26 years—but very useful when they did occur. (And it’s possible that there were really only 16 instances if they were coincident.)

Despite the methodology problems, the data shows that it is very profitable to go against the crowd at extremes. Extremes are times when the emotions of the crowd are likely to be most powerful and tempting to follow—and most likely to be wrong. Instead of bailing out at times when the crowd is negative, the data shows that it is better to add to your position.

HT to Abnormal Returns

Posted by:


Investor Sentiment: July Edition

September 12, 2012

Why, you may ask, am I writing about investor sentiment from July now that it is mid-September? I think it’s often a useful exercise to look back at the primary sources—the historical data—as my US history teacher used to point out. We all have a way of mis-remembering history. We modify it to fit the present, so that whatever happened seems inevitable. The future, of course, is always uncertain.

Investor sentiment is a peculiar form of history because it generally works in contrary fashion. Studies show that when investors are most bullish, the market tends to go down. And when investors are bearish, the market perversely tends to go up.

July was just such a period. Consider, for example, a CNBC article on the weekly sentiment poll conducted by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII):

Main Street bulls are fast becoming an endangered species.

Despite the fact that the broad U.S. stock market is up 8.4 percent in 2012, only 22 percent of mom-and-pop investors said they were bullish, the American Association of Individual Investors found in its latest weekly poll.

That’s the lowest sentiment reading since summer 2010, when markets were careening lower in the face of the first post-recession global growth scare and the emergence of Europe’s debt crisis.

But to drive home just how pessimistic Main Street investors have become in the face of a weak U.S. economy, slowing growth in China and continued uncertainty about Europe’s financial crisis, consider that:

• Bullishness now is more depressed than in the fall of 2008, when Wall Street titan Lehman Bros. declared bankruptcy, thrusting the financial crisis into a more dangerous phase.

• The percentage of bulls today is barely above the 18.9 percent on March 5, 2009, just four days before the bottom of the worst stock slide since the Great Depression.

I think it’s fair to say that investor sentiment was pretty negative in July.

So what’s happened since then? All of the bearish investors were not able to make the market go down. Instead, it has risen—the S&P 500 level has gone from about 1350 to 1435!

In fact, this is a typical outcome:

But all the negativity may turn out to be a positive: History shows that super-low sentiment readings tend to act as a contrarian signal. In other words, when everyone is worried, stocks tend to rally.

In fact, according to Bespoke, going back to November 2009, U.S. stocks have posted average gains of 5 percent — with gains 100 percent of the time — in the month after AAII’s sentiment poll showed bullish sentiment readings below 25 percent.

I added the bold to emphasize the cost of bad investor behavior. What if you had exited the market in July because you were bearish? About half of the gains year-to-date have occurred since then. Things always seem darkest before the dawn, but it’s important to resist bailing out when frightened. Better to structure your portfolio so that you can sit tight regardless of the current situation—or to cut back when things seem to be going exceptionally well. It’s tough to get the upside exit right, but it’s relatively easier to flag time periods marked by poor sentiment that are likely to be bad times to get out. If you stay the course, it could make a big positive difference to your returns.

Posted by:


Not Investing?

August 3, 2012

After poor stock market performance over the past few years, many investors are holding on to cash. A survey by BlackRock ranks the reasons why people aren’t investing, and the results may be different from what you had expected.

 Uncertainty about where to invest (37%)

 Belief that it’s a poor investing environment (26%)

 Fear of investing/losing money (23%)

 Previous portfolio losses (8%)

 Not applicable, have not pulled back on investment activity (6%)

Investors are not completely closed off to the idea of investing, but instead don’t know where they should put their money. One of the chief benefits of employing a relative strength strategy is that it provides the framework for allocating assets-thereby removing the biggest stumbling block to getting investors in the game.

Posted by:


Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

July 2, 2012

Our latest sentiment survey was open from 6/22/12 to 6/29/12. The Dorsey, Wright Polo Shirt Raffle continues to drive advisor participation, and we greatly appreciate your support! We will announce the winner early next week. This round, we had 49 advisors participate in the survey. If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are fairly comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Any statistical uncertainty this round comes from the fact that we only had three investors say that thier clients are more afraid of missing a stock upturn than being caught in a downdraft. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least three other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

GreatestFear622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. From survey to survey, the S&P 500 increased 0.71%. The greatest fear numbers did not perform as expected. The fear of downturn group increased from 86% to 94%, while fear of a missed opportunity decreased from 14% to 6%. Client sentiment remains poor.

GreatestFearSpread622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 2: Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. The spread increased from 73% to 88%.

Question 2. Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

AverageRiskAppetite622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. Average risk appetite did not perform as expected. It fell slightly from 2.41 to 2.39, even though S&P 500 rose.

AverageRiskAppetiteBellCurve622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. We are still seeing a low amount of risk, with most clients having a risk appetite of 2 or 3.

RiskAppetiteBellCurvebyGroup622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 5: Risk appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. The chat plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. Those who fear a downdraft prefer a low amount of risk, with most clients having a risk appetite of 2 or 3. We only had three responses that indicated a fear of missing an upturn, but even our limited number of responses showed that these people do prefer more risk.

AverageRiskAppetitebyGroup622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group. The average risk appetite of those who fear a downturn increased slightly with the market. The average risk appetite of those who fear missing an upturn also increased.

RiskAppetiteSpread622 1 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/22/12

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread increased this round and is at its highest level so far this year.

The S&P 500 rose by 0.71% from survey to survey, and some of our indicators responded accordingly. Average risk appetite by each group increased, but the total average risk appetite fell. As the market does better, we would expect more people to fear missing an upturn, yet more investors feared a downturn. Overall, client sentiment remains poor.

No one can predict the future, as we all know, so instead of prognosticating, we will sit back and enjoy the ride. A rigorously tested, systematic investment process provides a great deal of comfort for clients during these types of fearful, highly uncertain market environments. Until next time, good trading and thank you for participating.

Posted by:


Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

June 18, 2012

Our latest sentiment survey was open from 6/8/12 to 6/15/12. The Dorsey, Wright Polo Shirt Raffle continues to drive advisor participation, and we greatly appreciate your support! We will announce the winner early next week. This round, we had 44 advisors participate in the survey. If you believe, as we do, that markets are driven by supply and demand, client behavior is important. We’re not asking what you think of the market—since most of our blog readers are financial advisors, we’re asking instead about the behavior of your clients. Then we’re aggregating responses exclusively for our readership. Your privacy will not be compromised in any way.

After the first 30 or so responses, the established pattern was simply magnified, so we are comfortable about the statistical validity of our sample. Most of the responses were from the U.S., but we also had multiple advisors respond from at least four other countries. Let’s get down to an analysis of the data! Note: You can click on any of the charts to enlarge them.

Question 1. Based on their behavior, are your clients currently more afraid of: a) getting caught in a stock market downdraft, or b) missing a stock market upturn?

GreatestFear6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 1: Greatest Fear. From survey to survey, the S&P 500 increased 0.59%, and the greatest fear numbers did not perform as expected. The fear of downturn group increased from 80% to 86%, while fear of a missed opportunity decreased from 20% to 14%. Client sentiment is still poor overall.

GreatestFearSpread6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 2: Greatest Fear Spread. Another way to look at this data is to examine the spread between the two groups. The spread decreased from 61% to 73%.

Question 2. Based on their behavior, how would you rate your clients’ current appetite for risk?

AverageRiskAppetite6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 3: Average Risk Appetite. Once again, the average risk appetite performed as expected, rising from 2.48 to 2.62. As the market rose slightly, so did average risk appetite.

RiskAppetiteBellCurve6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 4: Risk Appetite Bell Curve. This chart uses a bell curve to break out the percentage of respondents at each risk appetite level. We are still seeing a low amount of risk, with most clients having a risk appetite of 2 or 3.

RiskAppetiteBellCurvebyGroup6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 5: Risk appetite Bell Curve by Group. The next three charts use cross-sectional data. The chat plots the reported client risk appetite separately for the fear of downdraft and for the fear of missing upturn groups. This chart performs as expected, with the upturn group wanting more risk than the downturn group. However, even the fear of missing an upturn group doesn’t want a very high amount of risk.

AverageRiskAppetitebyGroup6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 6: Average Risk Appetite by Group. The average risk appetite of those who fear a downturn slightly decreased, even as the market rose. The average risk appetite of those who fear missing an upturn increased.

RiskAppetiteSpread6812 Dorsey, Wright Client Sentiment Survey Results – 6/8/12

Chart 7: Risk Appetite Spread. This is a chart constructed from the data in Chart 6, where the average risk appetite of the downdraft group is subtracted from the average risk appetite of the missing upturn group. The spread increased this round, but is still within its normal range.

The S&P 500 rose by 0.59% from survey to survey, and some of our indicators responded accordingly. Average risk appetite increased, but the amount of risk desired is still low. As the market does well, we would expect more people to fear missing an upturn; instead, more people feared a downturn. Overall, client sentiment remains poor.

No one can predict the future, as we all know, so instead of prognosticating, we will sit back and enjoy the ride. A rigorously tested, systematic investment process provides a great deal of comfort for clients during these types of fearful, highly uncertain market environments. Until next time, good trading and thank you for participating.

Posted by:


One Good Data Point

May 30, 2012

This just in. We are now back at 5/25 levels for the S&P 500. From Tobias Levkovich at Citigroup, as reported by Business Insider:

Last Friday our panic-euphoria model, one of our proprietary sentiment models went into panic, that gives us a very high probability, almost 90 percent probability that markets are up in 6 months, and 96 percent probability that they’re are up in 12 months.

I have no idea how they come up with those probabilities, but it would be nice if it’s true. More generally, other analysts have also found a correlation between very negative investor sentiment and higher markets 6-12 months later.

Posted by:


Are Equities Dead or Just Resting?

May 29, 2012

CNBC carried an article today, via Financial Times, that talked about how much investors hate stocks. Some excerpts from the article:

…institutional investors, from pension funds to mutual funds sold directly to the public, have slashed holdings in the past decade. Stocks have not been so far out of favor for half a century. Many declare the “cult of the equity” dead.

Compared with bonds, stocks have not looked so cheap for half a century. During this period, the dividend yield — the amount paid out in dividends per share divided by the share price, a key measure of value — has been lower than the yield paid by bonds (which moves in the opposite direction to prices). In other words, investors were happy to take a lower interest rate from stocks than from bonds, despite their greater volatility, reflecting their confidence that returns from stocks would be higher in the long run.

But now investors want a higher yield from equities. According to Robert Shiller of Yale University, the dividend yield on U.S. stocks is today 1.97 percent — above the 1.72 percent yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds.

Some hope that the cycle is about to turn and that the preconditions for a new cult of the equity will emerge even if it takes time. Few people doubt, however, that the old cult of the equity — which steered long-term savers into loading their portfolios with shares — has died.

Indeed, equities have not been so cheap relative to bonds since 1956, which turned out to be one of the best moments in history to have bought stocks.

In the U.S., inflows to bond funds have exceeded equity inflows every year since 2007, with outright net redemptions from equity funds in each of the past five years.

I swear I’m not making this up. Side-by-side, the article discusses the death of the equity cult while it mentions that stocks are at the best buying point in 50 years, apparently without irony. Wow.

Somewhere down the road there will be a catalyst—I have no idea what it will be, but it could be much sooner than most think. Contrary opinion would suggest that we look closely at the presumption that equities are really dead. It’s quite possible that stocks, like Monty Python’s Norwegian Blue, are just resting. When sentiment gets so highly tilted to one side it is worth examining to see if, in fact, the opposite is true.

deadparrot Are Equities Dead or Just Resting?

Are Equities Dead or Just Resting?

 

Posted by: